EVOLUTIONARY RESPONSES TO CHANGING CLIMATE

By M. Davis, R. Shaw, Julie R. Etterson. 2005

804 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0d19bede6888cee55576648653e0169064080084

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Genetics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Comparative genetic responses to climate in the varieties of Pinus ponderosa and Pseudotsuga menziesii: Reforestation (2014, background): “Yet, careful analyses (e.g., Davis, 1989; Davis and Shaw, 2001; Davis et al., 2005) repeatedly have led to the conclusion that projected rates of climate change are faster than rates of response in natural systems (although see Kremer et al.”
Latitudinal shift in thermal niche breadth results from thermal release during a climate‐mediated range expansion (2015, background): “In practice these two processes often operate simultaneously, and both can have important reciprocal effects on biogeographical distributions and adaptations of species (Davis et al., 2005).”
Paleoecology meets genetics: deciphering past vegetational dynamics (2009, methodology): “We focus on tree taxa with extensive fossil records that can be compared with marker-based genetic surveys (for a discussion focusing on adaptive traits, see Davis et al. 2005).”
Climate Change Impacts on Plant Pathogens and Plant Diseases (2014, background): “As far as migration and adaptation to climate change are concerned (Davis et al. 2005), most pathogens will have an advantage over plants because of their shorter generation periods and, in many cases, their ability to be quickly dispersed by the wind.”
Applications and limitations of museum data for conservation and ecology, with particular attention to species distribution models (2010, background): “…et al., 2009); third, the climate may not change as predicted (Reilly et al., 2001); and, fourth, species may adapt to the new climate rather than undergoing shifts in their distribution (Davis and Shaw, 2001; Skelly et al., 2007; Charmantier et al., 2008; but see Davis et al., 2005; Visser, 2008).”
Adaptive microevolutionary responses to simulated global warming in Simocephalus vetulus: a mesocosm study (2007, background): “This further illustrates the potential of rapid evolution to interfere with ecological processes (reviewed by Davis et al., 2005; Hairston et al., 2005).”
Early bird catches the worm: germination as a critical step in plant invasion (2016, background): “…populations or changes in a species’ distribution range (Nicotra et al. 2010; Volis et al. 2015), or at the genetic level, such as adaptation (e.g. Davis et al. 2005; Wolkovich and Cleland 2014; Volis et al. 2015), will have a selective advantage over slowly-responding species (Willis et al.…”
Adaptation, Plasticity, and Extinction in a Changing Environment: Towards a Predictive Theory (2010, background): “There are three mechanisms by which a population can persist when its local environment changes: dispersal to track its preferred environment in space, genetic evolution to the new local conditions, or phenotypic plasticity [17,18].”
Epigenetics for ecologists. (2007, background): “…(Rice & Emery 2003; Bischoff et al. 2006), the invasion of exotic species (Mooney & Cleland 2001; Bossdorf et al. 2005; Strauss et al. 2006) and the response of ecological communities to global environmental change (Davis & Shaw 2001; Davis et al. 2005; Jump & Penuelas 2005; Parmesan 2006).”