Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos' procedure
By J. Figueira, Bernard Roy. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002
685 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0d10dbb6de594568ee58a2b146e8d8d2ca94ed66
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Control and Systems Engineering
- Alessandra Oppio
- Chiara D'Alpaos
- S. Sapuan
- Kannan Govindan
- S. Sharma
- Martin Brandt Jepsen
- Marjan Bahraminasab
- Pradeep Kumar
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Alessandra Oppio
- Chiara D'Alpaos
- S. Sapuan
- Kannan Govindan
- S. Sharma
- Martin Brandt Jepsen
- Marjan Bahraminasab
- Pradeep Kumar
Citations in the corpus
- A framework for weighting of criteria in ranking stage of material selection process (2012, methodology): “The method is simple and practical, but it occasionally leads to the same weights in an uncontrolled manner [25].”
- Multiresponse Optimization of Abrasive Water Jet Cutting Process Parameters Using TOPSIS Approach (2015, methodology): “The details and steps of Simos’ procedure are given in Ozcan et al. [13] with reference to Figueira and Roy [31].”
- ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications (2016, methodology): “Another example is the technique developed by Figueira and Roy (2002) called the “revised Simos’ procedure.””
- Multi-criteria Decision Analysis: A Strategic Planning Tool for Water Loss Management (2011, methodology): “The ranking of criteria are then transformed using an appropriate algorithm that attributes a numerical value to the weights of each criterion (Figueira and Roy 2002).”
- Ranking of Adaptive Reuse Strategies for Abandoned Industrial Heritage in Vulnerable Contexts: A Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding Approach (2019, methodology): “state the ratio z, that represents how many times the last criterion is more important than the first [69], which defines a fixed interval between the criteria weights.”