Economic Structure and Local Growth: France, 1984-1993

By Pierre-Philippe Combes. 2000

675 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0cb21a9045016228e25b250fd86669622c46a9b4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Identifying the Sources of Local Productivity Growth (2004, methodology): “Further studies helped to extend what is now known as the “urban growth” literature to countries other than the US (see, for example, Combes, 2000 for France; Cainelli and Leoncini, 1999 for Italy; and Bradley and Gans, 1996 for Australia).”
Spatial wage disparities: Sorting matters! (2008, background): “However one must be careful with respect to the interpretation of the coefficients (Combes, 2000).”
Geographical and sectoral clusters of innovation in Europe (2005, methodology): “It is clear that such a phenomenon has involved mainly the whole of France, Belgium, Denmark, the North of Italy, a few Northern regions in Spain and most importantly the South Finland and almost the whole of Sweden (see Map 1b, c, d).”
Why does the effect of new business formation differ across regions? (2011, background): “In order to account for the influence of industry structure on employment growth (Glaeser et al. 1992; Peneder 2002; Combes 2000), we also included the”
Do New Economic Geography agglomeration shadows underlie current population dynamics across the urban hierarchy (2009, background): “Yet, increased competition associated with proximity of economic activity acts as a dispersal force (Combes 2000), limiting agglomeration.”
Production and consumption externalities of human capital: an empirical study for Italy (2007, background): “Thus, the econometric problems that may arise from the selection of particular spatial entities may be potentially more severe for studies that focus on the US Metropolitan Areas (see Combes 2000 for a discussion).”
On the Economic Foundation of the Urban Network Paradigm: Spatial Integration, Functional Integration and Economic Complementarities within the Dutch Randstad (2009, background): “This is not surprising, since urban economists have for some time fuelled a burgeoning empirical literature that examines whether spatial circumstances give rise to agglomeration economies—external economies from which firms can benefit through co-location and local network creation—that endogenousl”
US Metropolitan Area Resilience: Insights from dynamic spatial panel estimation (2017, background): “…that resilience to economic shocks is shaped by, and shapes, industrial structure, broadly defined, has been considered elsewhere in the literature (Combes, 2000; Doran and Fingleton, 2014; Fingleton and Palombi, 2013; Glaeser, 2005; Glaeser et al., 2014; Holm and Østergaard, 2015; Martin, 2012;…”
The determinants of regional specialisation in business services: agglomeration economies, vertical linkages and innovation (2015, background): “Agglomeration economies have been analysed mainly with respect to their impact on regional growth and development and rarely accounted for as a determinant of sectoral specialisation, even when the sectoral dimension has been explicitly taken into account (Combes, 2000; van Oort, 2007).”
The Growth of Cities (2013, neutral): “See for instance Combes (2000) for France or Cingano and Schivardi (2004) for Italy.”
Nursery Cities: Urban Diversity, Process Innovation and the Life-Cycle of Products (2001, background): “New products are developed in diversified cities, trying processes borrowed from different activities.”