Diagnostic formulations in psychotherapy

By Charles Antaki, R. Barnes, I. Leudar. 2005

200 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Conversation analysts have noted that, in psychotherapy, formulations of the client's talk can be a vehicle for offering a psychological interpretation of the client's circumstances. But we notice that not all formulations in psychotherapy offer interpretations. We offer an analysis of formulations (both of the gist of the client's words and of their implications) that are diagnostic: that is, used by the professional to sharpen, clarify or refine the client's account and make it better able to provide what the professional needs to know about the client's history and symptoms. In doing so, these formulations also have the effect of shepherding the client's account towards subsequent therapeutic interpretation. In a coda, we notice that sometimes the formulations are designed discreetly. We examine one such discreet formulation in detail, and show how its very ambiguity can lead to its failure as a diagnostic probe.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0c9fa8660620ed595c40e27f688f5f6810863fb9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

  1. E. Weiste
  2. A. Peräkylä
  3. Galina B. Bolden

In Language and Linguistics

  1. E. Weiste
  2. A. Peräkylä
  3. Galina B. Bolden
  4. Andrea Golato
  5. Daniel M. K. Lam
  6. Maurice Nevile
  7. Andrew Dight Cohen
  8. Lorenza Mondada

Citations in the corpus