Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study.

By W. B. Meijboom, M. Meijs, J. Schuijf, M. Cramer, N. Mollet, C. Van Mieghem, K. Nieman, J. M. van Werkhoven, G. Pundziute, A. Weustink and 10 more. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2008

1,334 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0c6991f7f286dd0811627e5789b7a6596b9120e2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. W. Wijns
2. S. Garg
3. Philippe Kolh
4. Nicolas Danchin
5. J. Knuuti
6. C. Di Mario
7. Volkmar Falk
8. Thierry Folliguet

Citations in the corpus

• Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. (2010, background): “In the two multicentre trials published, one was consistent with the results of prior meta-analyses [20] but the other showed only moderate NPV (83 89%) [21].”
• Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain. (2012, background): “Coronary chest pain not associated with acute coronary syndrome 25 (5) 14 (3)”