Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain.
By U. Hoffmann, Q. Truong, David A. Schoenfeld, E. Chou, P. Woodard, J. Nagurney, J. Pope, T. Hauser, C. White, S. Weiner and 12 more. New England Journal of Medicine, 2012
861 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4a1bc4c5cf91b6de7c3fdca64225ed2c01777c17
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Citations in the corpus
- 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. (2014, methodology): “Prognosis Troponin elevations are useful for short- and long-term prognosis I B (48, 50, 83, 84) Remeasurement of troponin value once on d 3 or 4 in patients with MI may be reasonable as an index of infarct size and dynamics of necrosis IIb B (82, 83)”
- 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. (2014, methodology): “Coronary CT angiography is associated with rapid assessment, high negative predictive value, decreased length of stay, and reduced costs (205-207); however, in the latter studies, it increased the rate of invasive coronary angiography and revascularization with uncertain long-term benefits in low-ri”