CEERS Key Paper. I. An Early Look into the First 500 Myr of Galaxy Formation with JWST

By S. Finkelstein, M. Bagley, H. Ferguson, S. Wilkins, J. Kartaltepe, C. Papovich, L. Y. Aaron Yung, P. Haro, P. Behroozi, Mark Dickinson and 57 more. Astrophysical Journal Letters, 2022

335 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present an investigation into the first 500 Myr of galaxy evolution from the Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science (CEERS) survey. CEERS, one of 13 JWST ERS programs, targets galaxy formation from z ∼ 0.5 to >10 using several imaging and spectroscopic modes. We make use of the first epoch of CEERS NIRCam imaging, spanning 35.5 arcmin2, to search for candidate galaxies at z > 9. Following a detailed data reduction process implementing several custom steps to produce high-quality reduced images, we perform multiband photometry across seven NIRCam broad- and medium-band (and six Hubble broadband) filters focusing on robust colors and accurate total fluxes. We measure photometric redshifts and devise a robust set of selection criteria to identify a sample of 26 galaxy candidates at z ∼ 9–16. These objects are compact with a median half-light radius of ∼0.5 kpc. We present an early estimate of the z ∼ 11 rest-frame ultraviolet (UV) luminosity function, finding that the number density of galaxies at M UV ∼ −20 appears to evolve very little from z ∼ 9 to 11. We also find that the abundance (surface density [arcmin−2]) of our candidates exceeds nearly all theoretical predictions. We explore potential implications, including that at z > 10, star formation may be dominated by top-heavy initial mass functions, which would result in an increased ratio of UV light per unit halo mass, though a complete lack of dust attenuation and/or changing star formation physics may also play a role. While spectroscopic confirmation of these sources is urgently required, our results suggest that the deeper views to come with JWST should yield prolific samples of ultrahigh-redshift galaxies with which to further explore these conclusions.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0c333137a7b5e8cd30847cbd53294c935045bd44

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. R. Somerville
  4. M. Franx
  5. Christopher J. Conselice
  6. R. Dav'e
  7. P. V. van Dokkum
  8. C. Conroy

In Instrumentation

  1. M. Franx
  2. R. Somerville
  3. Christopher J. Conselice
  4. P. V. van Dokkum
  5. P. Hopkins
  6. G. Illingworth
  7. Richard S. Ellis
  8. R. Dav'e

Citations in the corpus