JWST CEERS and JADES Active Galaxies at z = 4–7 Violate the Local M •–M ⋆ Relation at >3σ: Implications for Low-mass Black Holes and Seeding Models

By F. Pacucci, Bao Nguyen, S. Carniani, R. Maiolino, Xiaohui Fan. Astrophysical Journal Letters, 2023

152 citations recorded by the source corpus.

JWST is revolutionizing our understanding of the high-z Universe by expanding the black hole horizon, looking farther and to smaller masses, and revealing the stellar light of their hosts. By examining JWST galaxies at z = 4–7 that host Hα-detected black holes, we investigate (i) the high-z M •–M ⋆ relation and (ii) the black hole mass distribution, especially in its low-mass range (M • ≲ 106.5 M ⊙). With a detailed statistical analysis, our findings conclusively reveal a high-z M •–M ⋆ relation that deviates at >3σ confidence level from the local relation. The high-z relation is log(M•/M⊙)=−2.43−0.83+0.83+1.06−0.09+0.09log(M⋆/M⊙) . Black holes are overmassive by ∼10–100× compared to their low-z counterparts in galactic hosts of the same stellar mass. This fact is not due to a selection effect in surveys. Moreover, our analysis predicts the possibility of detecting in high-z JWST surveys 5–15× more black holes with M • ≲ 106.5 M ⊙, and 10–30× more with M • ≲ 108.5 M ⊙, compared to local relation’s predictions. The lighter black holes preferentially occupy galaxies with a stellar mass of ∼107.5–108 M ⊙. We have yet to detect these sources because (i) they may be inactive (duty cycles 1%–10%), (ii) the host overshines the active galactic nucleus (AGN), or (iii) the AGN is obscured and not immediately recognizable by line diagnostics. A search of low-mass black holes in existing JWST surveys will further test the M •–M ⋆ relation. Current JWST fields represent a treasure trove of black hole systems at z = 4–7; their detection will provide crucial insights into their early evolution and coevolution with their galactic hosts.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6158689948e301e189574e06bd393645724b4b31

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. M. Trebitsch
  2. P. Dayal
  3. K. Caputi
  4. R. Maiolino
  5. F. Mannucci

Citations in the corpus