The Measurement of Intellectual Influence

By Ignacio Palacios-Huerta, Oscar Volij. 2004

341 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0c2fbac2cad34a49dd67b85829c2da35345f48f1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Life Cycle and Cohort Productivity in Economic Research: The Case of Germany (2008, neutral): “Keywords: Research productivity; life cycles; cohort effects.”
Academic honors and performance (2014, methodology): “…Liebowitz and Palmer (1984) p. 80–81, Table 1, column 3 Rankings Based on Impact Adjusted Citations to Articles Published 1975–1979 Invariant method Palacios-Huerta and Volij (2004) p. 972, Table 1, column 1 Invariant Method Ritzberger (2008) p. 413–418, Table 1, column 1 Value Tournament…”
A further step forward in measuring journals' scientific prestige: The SJR2 indicator (2012, background): “…developed by the creators of Google, there have arisen other metrics such as the Invariant Method for the Measurement of Intellectual Influence (Palacios-Huerta & Volij, 2004), the Journal Status (Bollen, Rodríguez & van de Sompel, 2006), the Eigenfactor (Bergstrom, 2007), and the Scimago…”
Thinking inside the box? Intellectual structure of the knowledge base of innovation research (1988–2008) (2013, methodology): “…can be represented by relevant academic journals (Agarwal and Hoetker, 2007) that were selected using EigenfactorTM classification (Eigenfactor Project, 2009) and ranking of Institute for Scientific Information (ISI)-listed journals for the year 2006 (cf. Palacios-Huerta and Volij, 2004).”
The inconsistency of the h-index (2011, neutral): “…Woeging r, 2008)1 and on other types of indicators (e.g., Albarrán, Ortuño, & Ruiz-Castillo, 2011; Bouyssou & Marchant, 2011a, 2011b; Marchant, 2009b; Palacios-Huerta & Volij, 2004; Ravallion & Wagstaff, 2011; Waltman & Van Eck, 2009a, 2010; Waltman, Van Eck, Van Leeuwen, Visser, & Van Raan, 2011).”
How To Count Citations If You Must (2016, background): “Given our ordinal perspective, we will have little to say about assigning scores to scholarly journals (e.g., Palacios-Huerta and Volij, 2004 and 2014) since such scores are typically used to translate publications from distinct journals into a common cardinal currency.”
Citations in Economics: Measurement, Uses and Impacts (2018, background): “Also, as Palacios-Huerta and Volij (2004) point out, ranking systems based on impact factors lack any basis in economic theory and are just one of very many ways of ranking journals’ influence.”
Communication and influence (2015, background): “As mentioned in the Introduction, eigenvector centrality displays properties that are unique among centrality measures (Palacios-Huerta and Volij 2004), and has been applied successfully in search engines and citation indices.”
Spectral Graph Theory (2012, background): “Palacios-Huerta and Volij [91] and Altman and Tennenholtz [92] have given abstract, axiomatic descriptions of the rankings produced by these vectors.”
Transparency and deliberation within the FOMC: a computational linguistics approach (2014, methodology): “And we carry out a placebo tests on the transparency change. handled by using recursive centrality measures, the most common of which is eigenvector centrality, which is used in a large number of domains (see Palacios-Huerta and Volij (2004) for a discussion and an axiomatic foundation).”