The Academic Conference as a Chilly Climate for Women: Effects of Gender Representation on Experiences of Sexism, Coping Responses, and Career Intentions

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Men, women and STEM: Why the differences and what should be done? (2020, background): “• Women may encounter sexism or harassment at work, in the field or at conferences, which may contribute to a desire to leave STEM or academia (Biggs et al., 2018; Clancy et al., 2014; Funk & Parker, 2018).”
Epistemic Exclusion of Women Faculty and Faculty of Color: Understanding Scholar(ly) Devaluation as a Predictor of Turnover Intentions (2021, unknown): “In academic settings, negative perceptions of the climate are associated with less interest in entering or remaining in academia (Biggs et al., 2018), especially for women (Callister, 2006).”
Impostor phenomenon and motivation: women in higher education (2020, background): “…increased standards, stress, pay inequality, exclusion, and harassment these elevated costs may contribute to diminished motivation towards academia (Austin 2016; Obers 2015; Howe-Walsh and Turnbull 2016; Monroe and Chiu 2010; Biggs, Hawley, and Biernat 2017; Newsome 2008; Hengel 2017; Smith 2017).”