Species-rich dung beetle communities buffer ecosystem services in perturbed agro-ecosystems
By Sarah A. Beynon, D. Mann, Eleanor M. Slade, O. Lewis. 2012
111 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Small Animals
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b916f08e7812f0877c337f2d8240abae2258ea7a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- J. Noriega
- M. March‐Salas
- Joaquín Hortal
- Héctor García-Q.
- Michael Christie
- Ana M. C. Santos
- Stephanie Castillo
- Jorge M. Lobo
Citations in the corpus
- Human perturbations reduce dung beetle diversity and dung removal ecosystem function (2021, background): “The proportion of variance (R2) explained by each parameter and their respective levels of significance are reported (e.g., Beynon et al., 2012; Braga et al., 2013; Tixier et al., 2015; our results).”
- The application of an ecosystem services framework to estimate the economic value of dung beetles to the U.K. cattle industry (2015, background): “Disturbances in agroecosystems may affect dung beetle communities, reducing the rates of dung removal and the associated benefits (Beynon et al., 2012a; Beynon, 2013).”
- Research trends in ecosystem services provided by insects (2017, unknown): “In addition, there is an evident bias in the literature we reviewed towards those groups that can be easily studied (e.g. towards above-vs. below-ground organisms), have larger body sizes (e.g. butterflies vs. flies), are readily identifiable (e.g. Carabidae are more often studied than the…”