OpenWSN: a standards‐based low‐power wireless development environment

By Thomas Watteyne, Xavier Vilajosana, B. Kerkez, Fabien Chraim, Kevin Weekly, Qin Wang, Steven D. Glaser, Kristofer S. J. Pister. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 2012

325 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Design of a WSN Platform for Long-Term Environmental Monitoring for IoT Applications (2013, background): “Moreover, the oscillator drift in extreme environmental conditions may require more frequent synchronization messages or repeated energy-intensive network re-registrations if time synchronization is lost [9], [24].”
Fog Computing for Sustainable Smart Cities (2017, background): “As represented in step (1) in Figure 3, low powered and low capable sensors [Watteyne et al. 2012] can be used to sense and data can be uploaded to the cloud with the help of nearby infrastructure (e.g., through communication devices attached to street lights or similar infrastructures that have…”
The Power of Models: Modeling Power Consumption for IoT Devices (2015, methodology): “Experiments were carried out using a GINA platform [33], and running the OpenWSN protocol stack [34].”
Interoperability in Internet of Things: Taxonomies and Open Challenges (2018, background): “There are currently many different OSs developed specifically for IoT devices such as Contiki(8), RIOT(9), TinyOS [29] and OpenWSN [30], each with several versions, to deliver services to users.”