The End of the Line? Accountable Governance in the Age of Networks, Partnerships, and Joined-Up Services

By M. Considine. 2002

277 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0bce5b098540d29e49cf094c930af2f5e69a394e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Public Administration

1. Wouter Van Dooren
2. Tom Willems
3. Benoît Dupont

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Wouter Van Dooren
2. Tom Willems
3. Benoît Dupont

In Strategy and Management

1. Wouter Van Dooren
2. Tom Willems
3. Benoît Dupont

Citations in the corpus

• Lost in diffusion? How collaborative arrangements lead to an accountability paradox (2011, background): “…of accountability tools, with its one-sided focus on formal sanctions (e.g. dismissal), is becoming less suitable to grasp the real nature of present-day governance (Behn, 2001; Considine, 2002; Dowdle, 2006; Flinders, 2001; Hodge and Coghill, 2007; Mulgan, 2003; Philp, 2009; Scott, 2000).”
• Security in the age of networks (2004, background): “The reflective accountability mechanisms needed in the security networks era are still in their infancy (Loader, 2000), and many other areas of state intervention face the same dilemma (Tshuma, 2000; Considine, 2002).”