Principles of Physical Layer Security in Multiuser Wireless Networks: A Survey
By A. Mukherjee, S. Ali A. Fakoorian, Jing Huang, A. L. Swindlehurst. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 2010
1,447 citations recorded by the source corpus.
This paper provides a comprehensive review of the domain of physical layer security in multiuser wireless networks. The essential premise of physical layer security is to enable the exchange of confidential messages over a wireless medium in the presence of unauthorized eavesdroppers, without relying on higher-layer encryption. This can be achieved primarily in two ways: without the need for a secret key by intelligently designing transmit coding strategies, or by exploiting the wireless communication medium to develop secret keys over public channels. The survey begins with an overview of the foundations dating back to the pioneering work of Shannon and Wyner on information-theoretic security. We then describe the evolution of secure transmission strategies from point-to-point channels to multiple-antenna systems, followed by generalizations to multiuser broadcast, multiple-access, interference, and relay networks. Secret-key generation and establishment protocols based on physical layer mechanisms are subsequently covered. Approaches for secrecy based on channel coding design are then examined, along with a description of inter-disciplinary approaches based on game theory and stochastic geometry. The associated problem of physical layer message authentication is also briefly introduced. The survey concludes with observations on potential research directions in this area.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Electrical and Electronic Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0aff52c8aacb220892aa471b7cb5f345dcb423d7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Robert Schober
- Derrick Wing Kwan Ng
- Rui Zhang
- Kai‐Kit Wong
- Lipeng Zhu
- Maged Elkashlan
- Hsiao-Hwa Chen
- Huseyin Arslan
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Robert Schober
- Huseyin Arslan
- Rui Zhang
- Haji. M. Furqan
- Jorge Cortés
- A. Mukherjee
- Giuseppe Caire
- F. Yu
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Rui Zhang
- Robert Schober
- M. Di Renzo
- Derrick Wing Kwan Ng
- Qingqing Wu
- Arumgam Nallanathan
- Maged Elkashlan
- Lipeng Zhu
Citations in the corpus
- Differentially private average consensus: Obstructions, trade-offs, and optimal algorithm design (2015, background): “Informationtheoretic approaches to privacy at the physical layer have been actively pursued [Gündüz et al., 2010, Mukherjee et al., 2014].”
- Security for 5G and Beyond (2019, background): “The fundamental principle behind physical layer security is to utilize the randomness of the noise and communication channels to restrict the amount of information that can be revealed by unauthorized receivers [131].”
- Classifications and Applications of Physical Layer Security Techniques for Confidentiality: A Comprehensive Survey (2019, background): “More precisely, in most of the available well-known PLS surveys such as [4], [5], [7],”
- Communications in the 6G Era (2020, background): “Physical layer security mechanisms [40], [41] typically depend on the uniqueness of the wireless channel to establish authentication, confidentiality and key exchange, and may become more mature in the timeframe of 6G, addressing new”
- Physical Layer Security in UAV Systems: Challenges and Opportunities (2019, neutral): “securIty AttAcKs In uAv systems A typical physical layer security communication problem comprises a minimum of three nodes, — a legitimate transmitter, a legitimate receiver, and a potential eavesdropper — which can be modeled by a wiretap channel [3].”
- Physical Layer Security for Next Generation Wireless Networks: Theories, Technologies, and Challenges (2017, background): “The survey in [158] divided PHY-security issues into two categories: i.”
- Covert Communications: A Comprehensive Survey (2023, methodology): “Previously, the information security protection either relied on the steganography [9] or the physical layer security (PLS) [10], [11], i.e., the message encryption in the application layer or the transmission techniques in the physical layer.”
- Physical-Layer Security in the Internet of Things: Sensing and Communication Confidentiality Under Resource Constraints (2015, background): “The choice of action depends on where its instantaneous channel fading gain to the LFC falls between a set of publicly known thresholds f 1; 2; 3g, with (2)More rigorous definitions and examples can be found in [79]–[81] and the extensive references within.”
- Secure Wireless Communication via Intelligent Reflecting Surface (2019, background): “Note that it is reasonable to assume that hAE and hIE are known in the scenario when the eavesdropper is an active user in the system but untrusted by the legitimate receiver [10].”
- Key Generation From Wireless Channels: A Review (2016, background): “Pioneered by Wyner’s wiretap channel model [11], keyless security does not require keys for encryption but employs code design and channel properties of legitimate users and eavesdroppers to achieve secrecy (see [8] and references therein).”
- A Survey on Multiple-Antenna Techniques for Physical Layer Security (2017, background): “[61] gave a primary investigation on multi-antenna techniques in multiuser wireless secrecy net-”
- A Survey of Physical Layer Security Techniques for 5G Wireless Networks and Challenges Ahead (2018, background): “tutorial papers for physical layer security research [11]–[14].”
- Secure Transmission in Cognitive Satellite Terrestrial Networks (2016, background): “In addition to upper layer approaches, the security problem has also been addressed from an information-theoretic perspective [8].”
- Safeguarding 5G wireless communication networks using physical layer security (2015, background): “Obviously, the current physical layer security technologies for the direct single-user and multi-user transmissions [3, 4] and the relay-aided communications [5] in conventional networks cannot be readily applied in this paradigm.”
- A Survey on Millimeter-Wave Beamforming Enabled UAV Communications and Networking (2021, background): “In addition to conventional anti-eavesdropping techniques, such as artificial noise and cooperative jamming [334], [335], [339], the flexibility of UAV positioning and the directionality of mmWave transmission can be exploited for improving secure communications.”