National estimates and race/ethnic-specific variation of selected birth defects in the United States, 1999-2001.

By M. Canfield, M. Honein, N. Yuskiv, J. Xing, Cara T. Mai, J. S. Collins, O. Devine, J. Petrini, Tunu A. Ramadhani, C. Hobbs and 1 more. Birth defects research. Clinical and molecular teratology, 2006

681 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Genetics, Rheumatology, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0ac8833c3f3ff80d8d5a7f467471fabafa838632

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Cara T. Mai
Jennifer L Isenburg
Tiffany J. Riehle‐Colarusso
Adolfo Correa
M. Canfield
R. Meyer
Samantha E. Parker
M. Reller

Citations in the corpus

Prevalence of Congenital Heart Defects in Metropolitan Atlanta, 1998–2005 (2008, background): “Although both these estimates were within the Hoffman and Kaplan interquartile range, the predominance of TOF relative to TGA has not been universally reported (17), a discrepancy that is probably due to the classification of double outlet right ventricle lesions.”
National population-based estimates for major birth defects, 2010–2014 (2019, methodology): “When examining the national prevalence estimates across three time periods (birth cohort 1999–2001 from Canfield et al. (2006); birth cohort 2004–2006 from Parker et al. (2010); and birth cohort 2010–2014 from this analysis), the estimated national prevalence remained relatively stable for most…”
Updated National Birth Prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004-2006. (2010, background): “In 2006, national birth prevalence estimates were published for the first time for 21 birth defects, based on surveillance data from 1999 through 2001 (Canfield et al., 2006).”