The evolution of subjective commitment to groups: A tribal instincts hypothesis.
By Peter J. Richerson, Robert Boyd. 2001
139 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0ab87d4814e117a1ca67fe62a4cc8ca2706da684
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- ChrisD . Frith
- Uta Frith
- Uwe Peters
- Kim Sterelny
- Tania Singer
- Sarah-Jayne Blakemore
- Jean Decety
- Carla Sharp
Citations in the corpus
- Mechanisms of social cognition. (2012, background): “As mentioned already, conformity itself is rewarding and thus may provide a basis for both producing and confirming stereotypic behavior (Richerson & Boyd 2001).”
- What Is the Function of Confirmation Bias? (2020, background): “ The assumption that the point also holds for ‘tribe’ members and collaborators, more generally, receives support from the “tribalinstincts hypothesis” (Richerson and Boyd 2001), which holds that humans tend to harbor “ethnocentric attitudes in favor of [their] own tribe along with its members,…”
- Genes, Memes and Human History (2004, background): “If there is variation across groups and little variation within them, group selection is likely to be powerful: see (Boyd and Richerson, 1996; Sober and Wilson, 1998; Richerson and Boyd, 1999; 2001 )).”