Rebound effects of price differences

By Joan Thiesen, Torben Christensen, Thomas G Kristensen, Rikke Dorothea Andersen, Brit Brunoe, Trine K Gregersen, M. Thrane, Bo Pedersen Weidema. 2008

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0a1ec798a8dd8835d6e5e3b2de73896c4369e239

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Environmental Engineering

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for U.S. households with input–output analysis Part 1: Theoretical framework (2013, background): “Goedkoop et al. (1999) argue that marginal spending patterns are more important than proportional or average spending patterns, and Thiesen et al. (2008) attempt to quantify these using slopes of spending patterns between one income group to the next higher income group.”
Circular Economy Rebound (2017, background): “The effect has been examined in a wide variety of arenas, including transportation (de Haan et al. 2007; Greening et al. 2000; Spielmann et al. 2008), lighting (Fouquet and Pearson 2012; Saunders and Tsao 2012), and even non-energy-related goods (Chalmers et al. 2015; Thiesen et al. 2008).”
Missing carbon reductions? Exploring rebound and backfire effects in UK households (2010, background): “8 As noted above, SELMA estimates the GHG emissions attributed to the three components of UK final demand (which is alternatively called consumption): household, investment and government.”
Scenario Analysis (2010, unknown): “…increase the demand for other goods and services if less money or time is spent on one service, could be easily incorporated into an ICT impact assessment model today as marginal consumption values of expenditure and their related impacts on GHG emissions (Thiesen et al. 2008; Tukker et al. 2006).”
More or Better? A Model for Changes in Household Greenhouse Gas Emissions due to Higher Income (2010, background): “As a consequence, recent estimates of increasing environmental impact with increasing expenditure would, for instance, overestimate the magnitude of the income rebound effect2 (Takase et al. 2005; Thiesen et al. 2008).”
Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. (2009, methodology): “Thiesen et al. (2008) used statistical data on private consumption in different income groups to estimate on what Danish households would spend the residual money in such a case.”
Consumers and their behavior: state of the art in behavioral science supporting use phase modeling in LCA and ecodesign (2016, methodology): “They then use data from household expenditure surveys to estimate separately for different levels of income how a small change in income might affect consumption (Thiesen et al. 2008).”
Consequential life cycle assessment: a review (2011, background): “As the price of personal computers falls due to gains in production efficiency, available consumer income (due to cheaper computers) can be spent on other goods (see Thiesen et al. 2008 for another example).”
Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: What Is It and What Are Its Challenges? (2016, methodology): “We illustrate this by the example of modelling rebound effects in a life cycle perspective, which has been addressed by several authors (Hertwich 2005 ; Hofstetter et al. 2006 ; Thiesen et al. 2008 ; Girod et al. 2011 ; Druckman et al. 2011 ; Font Vivanco and Voet 2014 ).”