Ideotype design for lodging-resistant wheat

By P. Berry, R. Sylvester-Bradley, S. Berry. Euphytica, 2007

197 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Agronomy and Crop Science, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0a1192d61a29ad8a7a0225385ba3aa8abd2e7b84

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Agronomy and Crop Science

In Soil Science

Citations in the corpus

Breeding and Cereal Yield Progress (2010, background): “tion. It also includes novel but physiologically sound calcu lations of the dry matter that must be invested in stems to minimize lodging risk ( Berry et al., 2007 ), thereby limiting harvest index (HI) to a value somewhat below the oftquoted maximum estimate of 0.62 (Austin, 1982).”
Wheat physiology: a review of recent developments (2011, background): “…crops to a tolerable risk, limits HI to closer to 0.50, and involves extra dry matter investment in surface roots for reduced root lodging risk (Berry et al. 2007); in addition, for a given yield level and HI, a larger spike size and corresponding culm diameter, via reducing culm number, is…”
Raising Crop Productivity in Africa through Intensification (2017, background): “0 • High grain yield • High harvest index • lodging tolerant [111]”
Physiological breeding I: interdisciplinary approaches to improve crop adaptation (2012, background): “Adequate parti ti oning among plant organs is also key to ensuring that plants with heavier grain weight have strong enough stems and roots to avoid structural failure (Berry et al., 2007).”
The Physiological Basis of the Genetic Progress in Yield Potential of CIMMYT Spring Wheat Cultivars from 1966 to 2009 (2015, background): “There may be limited scope to exploit plant height further for enhancing aboveground biomass, as further plant height increases would likely have implications for decreased lodging resistance (Berry et al., 2007).”
Avoiding lodging in irrigated spring wheat. I. Stem and root structural requirements (2016, methodology): “…of subsequent186 internodes 2 to 5 was calculated by multiplying the leverage exerted at the base of internode 1 with the ratio187 of the distance between the base of internodes 2, 3, 4 or 5 and the mid-point of the ear with the total stem188 height at the mid-point of the ear (Berry et al. 2007).”
Raising yield potential of wheat. II. Increasing photosynthetic capacity and efficiency. (2011, background): “In reviewing options to achieve greater lodging resistance, Berry et al. (2007) concluded that future, higheryielding wheat canopies will need to be shorter still, ideally closer to 70 cm in height rather than current canopy heights of c. 80–100 cm.”