Size‐dependent visual predation risk and the timing of vertical migration in zooplankton

By A. De Robertis, J. Jaffe, M. Ohman. 2000

104 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0a0207df62f9b1684ce0ecfd9fc75c49dca14ed8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Xabier Irigoien
2. G. Hays
3. R. Harris
4. Bj Godley
5. Lucy A. Hawkes
6. AC Broderick
7. G. Schofield
8. Colin D. MacLeod

In Global and Planetary Change

1. A. Staby
2. D. Conway
3. Xabier Irigoien
4. G. Hays
5. R. Harris
6. T. Klevjer
7. Bj Godley
8. AC Broderick

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. A. Staby
2. Xabier Irigoien
3. G. Hays
4. R. Harris
5. T. Klevjer
6. Bj Godley
7. AC Broderick
8. Lucy A. Hawkes

Citations in the corpus

• Effects of a decrease in downwelling irradiance on the daytime vertical distribution patterns of zooplankton and micronekton (2002, background): “Size partitioning within a species has been reported for copepods (Buskey et al. 1989; Hays et al. 1994), the pasiphaeid Pasiphaea multidentata (Matthews and Pinnoi 1973), the sergestid S. arcticus (Roe 1984a), the euphausiid Euphausia pacifica ( De Robertis et al. 2000 ), and several species of tel”
• Use of bottom-mounted echo sounders in exploring behavior of mesopelagic fishes (2009, background): “Echo sounders are now increasingly used for behavioral studies of plankton (DeRobertis et al. 2000, Genin et al. 2005, Kaartvedt et al. 2007) and fish (Huse & Ona 1996, Handegard & Tjøstheim 2005, Mehner 2006) and for in situ studies of predator–prey relationships (e.g. Zamon et al. 1996, Nøttestad…”
• Zooplanktivory by a nocturnal coral‐reef fish: Effects of light, flow, and prey density (2003, unknown): “De Robertis et al. (2000) showed that large zooplankton ascend to the”
• Flexible diel vertical migration behaviour of zooplankton in the Irish Sea (2004, background): “Ontogenic and size-dependent variations in DVM have generally been attributed to large individuals being more conspicuous and therefore more susceptible to visual predators (Hays et al. 1994, De Robertis et al. 2000) and to size-selectivity (Neill 1992).”
• A review of the adaptive significance and ecosystem consequences of zooplankton diel vertical migrations (2003, background): “Smaller zooplankton arrive at the surface earlier and leave later than larger forms, consistent with the interaction of light levels and prey size on prey perception by planktivorous fish (Hays, 1995; De Robertis et al., 2000).”