Why people prefer unequal societies
By Christina Starmans, Mark Sheskin, P. Bloom. 2017
361 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Demography, Safety Research, Social Psychology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
- Dani Rodrik
- Dacher Keltner
- Paul K. Piff
- Andrei A. Levchenko
- T. Boeri
- Kevin H. O'Rourke
- Richard O. Sinnott
In Safety Research
- Shimei Pan
- James R. Foulds
- Dani Rodrik
- Michael W. Kraus
- Dacher Keltner
- Paul K. Piff
- Olga Russakovsky
- Angelina Wang
In Social Psychology
- Michael W. Kraus
- Dacher Keltner
- Paul K. Piff
- N. Bennett
- Stéphane Côté
- A. S. R. Manstead
- Gerben A. van Kleef
- Cameron Anderson
Citations in the corpus
- An Intersectional Definition of Fairness (2018, background): “lgorithm may have different distributions depending on the protected attributes; a phenomenon known as infra-marginality [32]. Consequently, equity may not always correspond to fairness, as defined by [34]. It is also important to connect fairness and bias in algorithms to the broader context of fair”
- Populism and the economics of globalization (2018, background): “Three psychologists have recently provided interesting support for this idea (Starmans et al., 2017).”
- Unpacking the inequality paradox: The psychological roots of inequality and social class. (2018, background): “Recent work suggests that what drives much of the discomfort with inequality is the unfairness implied by wide discrepancies in resources (Day & Fiske, 2017; Starmans et al., 2017).”
- How just and just how? A systematic review of social equity in conservation research (2018, background): “There is evidence in the behavioral sciences that people are more concerned with ‘fairness’ than equality (Starmans et al 2017).”