Influence of specimen dimensions and strain measurement methods on tensile stress–strain curves
By Yonghao Zhao, Yazhou Guo, Q. Wei, T. Topping, A. M. Dangelewicz, Yuntian Zhu, Terence G. Langdon, Enrique J. Lavernia. 2009
220 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/09ce94c0aa95cef5b004d9c5b793bd9f22776a00
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Materials Chemistry
In Mechanical Engineering
In Mechanics of Materials
Citations in the corpus
- Review on superior strength and enhanced ductility of metallic nanomaterials (2018, background): “It should be noted that due to small sample size, the elongation to failure presented in this figure and others reported in the literature may be significantly over-estimated [31,32].”
- Nanostructural hierarchy increases the strength of aluminium alloys. (2010, unknown): “The use of miniature specimens has been previously investigated in detail; our studies indicate that, although the strain measurement method and tensile specimen geometry can affect the results, when the strain is accurately measured, the specimen size and geometry only affect the postnecking elonga”
- Ductility and Plasticity of Nanostructured Metals: Differences and Issues (2018, methodology): “Therefore, the uniform elongation should not be affected by the gage length of the sample if the sample gage length is not so short that it induces a three-dimensional stress state [20].”