Collective Action in Action: Prosocial Behavior in and out of the Laboratory
By Michael Gurven, Jeffrey Winking. 2008
141 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Demography, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/09c60c763d0d6c15c0c0f5e1501ed904474c1265
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
- Daniel Nettle
- R. Sear
- Mhairi A. Gibson
- K. McAuliffe
- Juan-Camilo Cardenas
- Sonja Pointner
- Marco A. Janssen
- D. Lawson
In Safety Research
- Björn Vollan
- Marco A. Janssen
- François Bousquet
- J. Marty Anderies
- Robert Tobias
- María López
- Daniel Castillo
- Amber Wutich
In Sociology and Political Science
- Björn Vollan
- Daniel Nettle
- Dimitris Xygalatas
- Daniel Haun
- K. McAuliffe
- Juan-Camilo Cardenas
- Sonja Pointner
- Michael Tomasello
Citations in the corpus
- The external validity of giving in the dictator game (2012, background): “Gurven and Winking (2008) find no relation between the in-lab experimental behavior (dictator and ultimatum games) of Bolivian indigenous inhabitants and the observed every day sharing of food.”
- Human behavioral ecology: current research and future prospects (2013, background): “2007), and much of behavioral economics consists of artificial games whose relevance to actual allocation decisions outwith the laboratory has been questioned (Levitt and List 2007; Bardsley 2008; Gurven and Winking 2008).”
- Fair Is Not Fair Everywhere (2015, background): “In contrast, in many small-scale societies (e.g., Hai||om and Samburu), most exchanges take place between individuals familiar with one another and who repeatedly interact in various domains (Gurven, 2004; Gurven & Winking, 2008).”
- Cross-cultural, developmental psychology: integrating approaches and key insights (2020, background): “For instance, Omra villagers treat the public goods game as they would their local tradition of community fundraising, known as harambee (Ensminger, 2004; Gurven & Winking, 2008).”
- What's the right thing to do? Increasing pro-sociality with simple moral nudges (2017, unknown): “…Englmaier & Gebhardt, 2016; Exadaktylos, Espín & Brañas-Garza, 2013; Fehr & Leibbrandt, 2011; Franzen & Pointner, 2013), whereas others challenging this view by reporting only a weak association, if any at all (Galizzi & Navarro-Martinez, forthcoming; Gurven & Winking, 2008; Winking & Mizer, 2013).”
- The challenge of understanding decisions in experimental studies of common pool resource governance (2011, background): “There is mixed evidence for the external validity of experimental studies: behavior in the experiments sometimes does not match observed behavior outside the experiment (Gurven and Winking, 2008), and sometimes it does (Rustagi et al., 2010).”
- Effects of religious setting on cooperative behavior: a case study from Mauritius (2013, background): “Although not a natural measure (Gurven & Winking, 2008), they are widely used as a proxy for cooperation because they measure actual behaviors rather than self-reported attitudes.”