Making ‘dirty’ nations look clean? The nation state and the problem of selecting and weighting indices as tools for measuring progress towards sustainability
By S. Morse, Evan D. G. Fraser. 2005
136 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Building and Construction, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/09bdb955ae2c83255c25ec0ca9f43223ef7a4942
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Building and Construction
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- M. Reed
- A. Dougill
- Evan D. G. Fraser
- Lindsay C. Stringer
- Koichiro Mori
- Aris Christodoulou
- Nancy Holman
Citations in the corpus
- An adaptive learning process for developing and applying sustainability indicators with local communities (2006, background): “As a result, the ESI has been thoroughly critiqued for ignoring local contextual issues ( Morse and Fraser, 2005 ).”
- Characterising the nature of household vulnerability to climate variability: empirical evidence from two regions of Ghana (2013, background): “…data at the national level could mask significant local-level variability in terms of access to assets and entitlements (Eakin and Bojorquez-Tapia 2008) because of the problem of aggregation that makes particular poor regions seem less vulnerable than they really are (see Morse and Fraser 2005).”
- Review of sustainability indices and indicators: Towards a new City Sustainability Index (CSI) (2012, background): “The ESI downplays or ignores transboundary or spillover effects of northern countries' unsustainable consumption (Morse and Fraser, 2005).”