An adaptive learning process for developing and applying sustainability indicators with local communities
By M. Reed, Evan D. G. Fraser, A. Dougill. 2006
809 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Building and Construction, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/47d24e24bb2d3a98ab59f81fb1050f49633ceead
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Building and Construction
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- J. Kenter
- Nancy Holman
- M. Reed
- A. Dougill
- Ioannis A. Pissourios
- Evan D. G. Fraser
- Lindsay C. Stringer
- Koichiro Mori
Citations in the corpus
- Stakeholder mapping for the governance of biosecurity: a literature review (2015, background): “First, it is suggested that engaging with a representative cross-section of stakeholders can lead to higher quality decisions with more durable outcomes by providing a wider range of higher quality information inputs to choose from (e.g. Hansen 1994; Reed et al. 2006, 2008).”
- Incorporating local sustainability indicators into structures of local governance: a review of the literature (2009, background): “…in the Kalahari to forestry management in Western Canada, they acknowledge that a level of integration between “soft” and “hard” approaches to indicator development brings about the best hope for measuring progress toward sustainable development (Reed et al. 2005, 2006, Fraser et al. 2006).”
- What is social learning (2010, background): “…Ison and Watson 2007, Mostert et al. 2007, Pahl-Wostl et al. 2007a,b, Steyaert and Ollivier 2007, Tàbara and Pahl-Wostl 2007, Pahl-Wostl et al. 2008) and elsewhere, including work by the authors of this article (e.g., Reed et al. 2006, Stringer et al. 2006, Prell et al. 2008; Newig et al. 2010).”
- Typologies of crop-drought vulnerability: an empirical analysis of the socio-economic factors that influence the sensitivity and resilience to drought of three major food crops in China (1961–2001) (2009, background): “This literature has exposed the complexity of trying to identify social factors that are linked to climate vulnerability (e.g. see: Reed et al., 2006; Sullivan and Meigh, 2005; Thomas and Twyman, 2005; Thornton et al., 2006).”
- How Can Rural Tourism Be Sustainable? A Systematic Review (2020, background): “Furthermore, it should be verifiable and easily accessible to decision-makers [56].”
- An interdisciplinary study on indicators: A comparative review of quality-of-life, macroeconomic, environmental, welfare and sustainability indicators (2013, background): “manifesting themselves at other scales than the local are also taken into consideration (Næss, 2001), while there is always the danger that local people may fall prey to the same beliefs and values that have led to current unsustainable positions (Reed et al., 2006).”
- A place-based approach to payments for ecosystem services (2017, background): “Rather than becoming a “black box” that may disempower stakeholders (Reed et al., 2006), monitoring and verification has the potential to engage landowners and managers to monitor ecosystem services, providing important feedbacks to sustainable land management.”
- Environmental, social and economic information management for the evaluation of sustainability in urban areas: A system of indicators for Thessaloniki, Greece (2010, methodology): “development approaches, a meticulous review is presented by Reed et al. (2006) and Scipioni et al.”
- Sustainable tourism indicators: selection criteria for policy implementation and scientific recognition (2013, neutral): “…2012; Manning, 1999; Miller, 2001; Niemeijer & de Groot, 2008; Rajaonson & Tanguay, 2010; Rametsteiner, Pülzl, Alkan-Olsson, & Frederiksen, 2010; Reed et al., 2006; Roberts & Tribe, 2008; Schianetz, Kavanagh, & Lockington, 2007; Schianetz and Kavanagh, 2008; Staler, 1997; Tanguay, Rajaonson,…”
- Review of sustainability indices and indicators: Towards a new City Sustainability Index (CSI) (2012, background): “Although the scientifically rigorous indicators used in the top–down paradigm can be objective, they may be difficult for local people to use (Reed et al., 2006).”