Gasoline Taxes and Consumer Behavior

By Shanjun Li, Joshua Linn, Erich Muehlegger. 2014

354 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/093fc4295f47b63600515b2de27cc734e61fe2ee

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. J. Sallee
2. Mark Jacobsen
3. Sören Anderson
4. Shanjun Li
5. J. Andersson
6. D. Fedor
7. Lynn H. Kaack
8. T. Konc

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. Mark Jacobsen
2. J. Sallee
3. Sören Anderson
4. Shanjun Li
5. J. Andersson
6. Lynn H. Kaack
7. J. Bergh
8. Stefan Drews

Citations in the corpus

• Decarbonizing intraregional freight systems with a focus on modal shift (2018, background): “is lower in states where the taxes change frequently [171].”
• Better Lucky Than Rich? Welfare Analysis of Automobile Licence Allocations in Beijing and Shanghai (2018, result): “These positive correlations are consistent with evidence of vehicle ownership and travel behavior in the U.S. (Small and Van Dender 2007; Li et al. 2009, 2014).10 Since the major part of externalities from automobile usage in urban areas comes from congestion and air pollution and these…”
• Anticipation, Tax Avoidance, and the Price Elasticity of Gasoline Demand (2015, neutral): “Li et al. (2014) rely on global crude oil prices as the instrument.”
• Evaluating US Fuel Economy Standards in a Model with Producer and Household Heterogeneity (2013, methodology): “(2009), and supply is given by the model described in Section I. The pair of models has the advantage of consistency in the sense that I employ the same data sources and assumptions throughout. The household level results from Bento et al. (2009), described in Section IIIA, are used to derive a set ”
• Designing an effective climate-policy mix: accounting for instrument synergy (2021, background): “make this tax more salient, increasing the responsiveness of consumers (Li et al., 2014).”
• Tracking global carbon revenues: A survey of carbon taxes versus cap-and-trade in the real world (2016, background): “For carbon taxes specifically, Rivers and Schaufele (2014) argue that the British Columbia carbon tax’s impact on gasoline prices has been more salient than an equivalent change in market prices, reflected in a seven-fold larger than expected response in consumer demand in that province, supporting ”
• Carbon Taxes and CO2 Emissions: Sweden as a Case Study (2019, background): “Li et al. (2014) analyses gasoline tax changes in the US and finds that ”a $0.01 tax change is associated with an order of magnitude greater increase in media coverage, as compared to a $0.01 change in the tax-exclusive price” (p. 327).”
• What Goes Up May Not Come Down: Asymmetric Incidence of Value-Added Taxes (2020, neutral): “4 uments non-standard responses to consumption taxes – such as in Chetty et al. (2009), Marion and Muehlegger (2011), Li et al. (2014), Feldman and Ruffle (2015), Taubinsky and Rees-Jones (2015), Harju et al. (2017) and Kopczuk et al. (2016).”
• Using Loopholes to Reveal the Marginal Cost of Regulation: The Case of Fuel-Economy Standards (2011, background): “Weiss 1992; Marya Morris 2000). At least half of all cities and towns with zoning laws reportedly have some incentive zoning program (Morris 2000). 4 Anderson (2011) shows that demand for ethanol exists and is sensitive to fuel prices.”