PROPERTIES OF THE YOUNGEST PROTOSTARS IN PERSEUS, SERPENS, AND OPHIUCHUS

By M. Enoch, N. Evans II, A. Sargent, J. Glenn. 2008

284 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present an unbiased census of deeply embedded protostars in Perseus, Serpens, and Ophiuchus, assembled by combining large-scale 1.1 mm Bolocam continuum and Spitzer Legacy surveys. We identify protostellar candidates based on their mid-infrared (mid-IR) properties, correlate their positions with 1.1 mm core positions from Enoch et al. in and , and Young et al. in , and construct well-sampled spectral energy distributions using our extensive wavelength coverage (λ = 1.25–1100 μm). Source classification based on the bolometric temperature yields a total of 39 Class 0 and 89 Class I sources in the three-cloud sample. We compare to protostellar evolutionary models using the bolometric temperature–luminosity diagram, finding a population of low-luminosity Class I sources that are inconsistent with constant or monotonically decreasing mass accretion rates. This result argues strongly for episodic accretion during the Class I phase, with more than 50% of sources in a “sub-Shu” (dM/dt < 10−6M☉ yr−1) accretion state. Average spectra are compared to protostellar radiative transfer models, which match the observed spectra fairly well in Stage 0, but predict too much near-IR and too little mid-IR flux in Stage I. Finally, the relative number of Class 0 and Class I sources is used to estimate the lifetime of the Class 0 phase; the three-cloud average yields a Class 0 lifetime of 1.7 ± 0.3 × 105 yr, ruling out an extremely rapid early accretion phase. Correcting photometry for extinction results in a somewhat shorter lifetime (1.1 × 105 yr). In Ophiuchus, however, we find very few Class 0 sources (NClass 0/NClass I ∼ 0.1–0.2), similar to previous studies of that cloud. The observations suggest a consistent picture of nearly constant average accretion rate through the entire embedded phase, with accretion becoming episodic by at least the Class I stage, and possibly earlier.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Spectroscopy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0932e291be1b0f4692b5f8c5c70c134470db834e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. N. Evans II
  2. Ralf Klessen
  3. Mark R. Krumholz
  4. K. Luhman
  5. P. Myers
  6. G. Herczeg
  7. L. Hillenbrand
  8. L. Hartmann

In Spectroscopy

  1. N. Evans II
  2. Simon Bruderer
  3. E. Bergin
  4. P. Caselli
  5. K. Luhman
  6. G. Herczeg
  7. M. Tafalla
  8. E. Dishoeck

Citations in the corpus