Universal Option Models
By Hengshuai Yao, Csaba Szepesvari, Richard S. Sutton, Joseph Modayil, Shalabh Bhatnagar. 2014
32 citations recorded by the source corpus.
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Sergey Levine
- Yoshua Bengio
- Pieter Abbeel
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
- Yuxi Li
- Trevor Darrell
- Abhinav Kumar Gupta
- Chelsea Finn
Citations in the corpus
- Successor Features for Transfer in Reinforcement Learning (2016, background): “[28], whose universal option model closely resembles our approach in some aspects (the main difference being that they do not do GPI).”
- Deep Successor Reinforcement Learning (2016, methodology): “nt improvements over -greedy, but are limited due to the underlying models functioning at the level of basic actions. Hierarchical reinforcement learning algorithms [1] such as the options framework [38, 39] provide a flexible framework to create temporal abstractions, which will enable exploration a”
- Symmetry Learning for Function Approximation in Reinforcement Learning (2017, methodology): “ss by learning from agent observations but their approach is suboptimal as they fail to discover all the abstractions [12]. 2 Recent approaches for incorporating TAA use linear function approximation [17, 18] and have been shown to be eective. Value function generalization for sub goal setting by [1”
- Universal Value Function Approximators (2015, methodology): “Finally, a UVFA could also be used as a universal option model (Yao et al., 2014).”