Carbon payments as a safeguard for threatened tropical mammals

By O. Venter, Erik Meijaard, Hugh P. Possingham, Rona Dennis, Douglas Sheil, Serge A. Wich, L. Hovani, K. Wilson. 2009

171 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/090a59c4213f741b40fb7fd8f29d66b3546d388c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Corey J. A. Bradshaw
2. N. Sodhi
3. Xingli Giam
4. M. Struebig
5. Laurentius N. Ambu
6. R. Clements
7. Barry W. Brook

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Xingli Giam
2. B. Cashore
3. N. Sodhi
4. Constance L. McDermott

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Corey J. A. Bradshaw
2. Xingli Giam
3. B. Cashore
4. M. Struebig
5. G. Paoli
6. N. Sodhi
7. Constance L. McDermott
8. R. Clements

Citations in the corpus

• Future habitat loss and the conservation of plant biodiversity (2010, background): “The inclusion of the REDD mechanism in the new UNFCCC might allow developing countries with high conservation need to increase economic revenue, prevent habitat loss, while mitigating carbon emissions and effects of climate change (Venter et al., 2009).”
• Trio under threat: can we secure the future of rhinos, elephants and tigers in Malaysia? (2010, background): “While intense debates still surround the incorporation of a REDD framework in a treaty succeeding the Kyoto protocol, there is little doubt that this materializes, it could provide much security to RET habitats if included in future climate change agreements (e.g., Venter et al. 2009 ).”
• The impacts and opportunities of oil palm in Southeast Asia: What do we know and what do we need to know? (2009, background): “…are allowed to be traded on compliance markets (currently they are restricted to voluntary markets) the conversion of land to oil palm plantations will be more profitable than REDD (Butler et al 2009, Venter et al 2009) except perhaps in the case of carbon-rich peat forests (Venter et al. 2009).”
• Mitigating the biodiversity impacts of oil palm development (2010, background): “Yet, markets are still voluntary and realization of market potential may rely on REDD being adopted into the postKyoto treaty; without this, carbon prices will be too low, leaving standing forests without the economic edge needed to encourage their conservation [14, 55, 56].”
• Trade-offs, co-benefits and safeguards: Current debates on the breadth of REDD+. (2012, background): “Many scholars and decision makers hope REDD+ will realize these ‘win-win’ solutions [3 ,4], among others by ‘automatically’ supporting biodiversity conservation efforts [5,6].”