Does batterers' treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment.
By J. Babcock, Charles E. Green, C. Robie. Clinical Psychology Review, 2004
1,357 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Health, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/08ecaad872e97f661e8d154facbc13419dbd3916
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
- E. Gondolf
- D. Dutton
- K. Corvo
- J. B. Kelly
- Michelle Carney
- Murray A. Straus
- Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling
- L. Jewell
In Health
- E. Gondolf
- D. Dutton
- Murray A. Straus
- K. Corvo
- Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling
- Michelle Carney
- John R. Barner
- Anthony Ralston
In Sociology and Political Science
- E. Gondolf
- D. Dutton
- Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling
- Murray A. Straus
- Anthony Ralston
- K. Corvo
- C. Hollin
- M. Huss
Citations in the corpus
- Effects of Motivational Enhancement on Immediate Outcomes of Batterer Intervention (2011, background): “There are now over 40 published studies, five meta-analyses and numerous commentaries on this field of research (e.g., Babcock et al. 2004; Feder and Wilson 2005; Gondolf 2004; Scott 2004a).”
- Evaluating offending behaviour programmes (2008, result): “Babcock et al. (2004) reported a meta-analysis, including studies using quasi-experimental and experimental designs, of treatment outcome for men who had committed domestic violence.”
- Why the Overwhelming Evidence on Partner Physical Violence by Women Has Not Been Perceived and Is Often Denied (2009, background): “Recent articles and books (eg, Dutton, 2006 ; Hamel & Nicholls, 2007 ; O'Leary & Woodin, 2009 ; Straus, 2009 ; Stuart, 2005 ) indicate a process that is likely to ultimately change the current pattern of denial of gender symmetry in the scholarly literature as well as the current failure to app”
- A meta-analytic review of court-mandated batterer intervention programs: Can courts affect abusers’ behavior? (2005, background): “BTo a clinician, this means that a woman is 5% less likely to be re-assaulted by a man who was arrested, sanctioned, and went to a batterers’ program than by a man who was simply arrested and sanctioned^ ( Babcock et al. 2004: 1004).”
- The Duluth model: A data-impervious paradigm and a failed strategy (2007, methodology): “CBT has been mixed in with psychoeducational models, usually by therapists frustrated with the Duluth approach (see also Babcock et al., 2004; Babcock et al., 2007).”
- Batterer intervention programmes: A meta-analytic review of effectiveness (2013, methodology): “%) than the measure based on Couple Reports (CRs), which is estimated to be 35% (Babcock et al., 2004; O’Leary et al., 1989; Rosenfled, 1992).”
- DIFFERENTIATION AMONG TYPES OF INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE: RESEARCH UPDATE AND IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS (2008, background): “Situational Couple Violence is less likely to escalate over time than Coercive Controlling Violence, sometimes stops altogether, and is more likely to stop after separation (Babcock et al., 2004; Johnson & Ferraro, 2000; Johnson & Leone, 2005; Johnston & Campbell, 1993).”
- Transforming a flawed policy: A call to revive psychology and science in domestic violence research and practice (2006, methodology): “Babcock et al. (2004) put recidivism rates at 35% for a 6–12 month follow-up according to wives, and 21% for the same time period using criminal justice data (arrests).”
- Engaging fathers in child welfare services: a narrative review of recent research evidence (2012, methodology): “These have been used to intervene with men who abuse women partners, with some modest success, as a meta-analysis of intervention studies has demonstrated (Babcock et al. 2004).”
- Anger Problem Profiles among Partner Violent Men: Differences in Clinical Presentation and Treatment Outcome. (2007, neutral): “tions (Babcock et al., 2004), the association between IPV and”
- THEORETICAL AND RESEARCH SUPPORT FOR THE DULUTH MODEL: A REPLY TO DUTTON AND CORVO (2007, background): “7 Dutton and Corvo also refer to the most prominent meta-analysis of the existing batterer program evaluations that shows small effect sizes and little difference between CBTand Duluth Model effects (Babcock, Green, & Robie, 2004).”