Effects of ontogeny and soil nutrient supply on production, allocation, and leaf area efficiency in loblolly and slash pine stands
162 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/08bcc0a0d9cc4980c5039faf05647b63e44fa658
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Stand development and production dynamics of loblolly pine under a range of cultural treatments in north-central Florida USA (2004, background): “…light interception, growth efficiency and nutrient cycling processes (Swindel et al., 1988, 1989; Neary et al., 1990; Colbert et al., 1990; Dalla-Tea and Jokela, 1991; Escamilla et al., 1991; Polglase et al., 1992a,b,c,d; Grierson et al., 1998, 1999; Martin, 2000; Jokela and Martin, 2000).”
- Long-term trends in loblolly pine productivity and stand characteristics in response to thinning and fertilization in the West Gulf region (2004, unknown): “Similar to the findings of other scientists (Vose and Allen, 1988; Colbert et al., 1990; Vose et al., 1994; Albaugh et al., 1998; Jokela and Martin, 2000; Samuelson et al., 2001), greater total tree photosynthesis resulting from increased leaf area appears to be the most likely variable driving stan”
- Long term growth responses of loblolly pine to optimal nutrient and water resource availability (2004, background): “…SE US pine plantations can dramatically increase stand productivity as leaf area is often well below the optimum for maximum light interception and consequently optimum production (Vose and Allen, 1988; Colbert et al., 1990; Albaugh et al., 1998; Sampson and Allen, 1999; Jokela and Martin, 2000).”
- Linkages between silviculture and ecology: examination of several important conceptual models (2004, background): “Jokela and Martin (2000) were able to increase and maintain steady-state values of foliage mass with annual fertilization in both loblolly pine and slash pine.”
- Twenty-Five Years of Intensive Forest Management with Southern Pines: Important Lessons Learned (2010, background): “Impressive growth responses to the applied silvicultural treatments were evident for both species over time for this experimental location (Colbert et al. 1990, Jokela and Martin 2000, Martin and Jokela 2004a, 2004b; Figure 1).”
- Production, allocation, and stemwood growth efficiency of Pinus taeda L. stands in response to 6 years of intensive management (2004, methodology): “per year reported for 6‐23-year-old slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm.) and 7‐9-year-old loblolly pine (Gholz et al., 1991; Jokela and Martin, 2000 ), and 17 Mg ha� 1 per year observed for 50-year-old Dou-”