Landscapes to Riverscapes: Bridging the Gap between Research and Conservation of Stream Fishes

By K. Fausch, Christian E. Torgersen, C. Baxter, Hiram W. Li. 2002

1,636 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/086287b42b48f2e9b06981796071739ce9c25852

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Fish movement and habitat use depends on water body size and shape (2009, background): “There is a lack of knowledge on fish movement at different life stages at spatial scales between 10 m and watershed scale which is necessary for a complete understanding of fish movement and life cycling (Fausch et al. 2002).”
Influence of habitat heterogeneity on the distribution of larval Pacific lamprey (Lampetra tridentata) at two spatial scales (2004, background): “Direct inclusion of locational variables may explain additional variation in the regression model because habitat characteristics alone may be ineffective in predicting the distribution of stream fishes (Fausch et al., 2002).”
Tangled webs: reciprocal flows of invertebrate prey link streams and riparian zones (2005, background): “Stream and riparian ecologists have begun to develop more continuous, holistic perspectives of riverine landscapes (Fausch et al., 2002b; Tockner et al., 2002; Wiens, 2002), and more studies are focusing on heterogeneity in river networks that sets the spatial context for variation in food web…”
LINKING DISPERSAL TO LOCAL POPULATION DYNAMICS: A CASE STUDY USING A HEADWATER SALAMANDER SYSTEM (2003, background): “…movement, demography, and habitat quality will lead to novel research questions (Cuddington and Yodzis 2002, Power and Dietrich 2002) and methods (Fausch et al. 2002) that strengthen basic knowledge of stream ecology, and increase the contribution of this discipline to general ecological theory…”
Spatiotemporal Patterns and Changes in Missouri River Fishes (2005, background): “As migratory organisms, fishes are ideal indicators of longitudinal and lateral connectivity across the riverscape (Jungwirth 1998; Fausch et al. 2002).”
INFLUENCE OF BARRIERS TO MOVEMENT ON WITHIN‐WATERSHED GENETIC VARIATION OF COASTAL CUTTHROAT TROUT (2005, background): “Fausch et al. (2002) argue that stream fish conservation measures have often failed because research is not focused at intermediate spatial scales (103–105 m) that are pertinent for many stream fishes and that are relevant to human manage ment of watersheds.”
Multiscale effects of flow regime and habitat and their interaction on fish assemblage structure in eastern Australia (2007, background): “Compared with other aquatic biota, fish are long-lived and mobile and so may occupy a variety of habitats and hence may encounter a range of environmental conditions throughout their life span (Fausch et al. 2002).”
Movement patterns in inland cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki utah): management and conservation implications (2004, background): “1994; Rodriguez 2002) because of the importance of movement patterns to management and conservation of stream fishes (Fausch et al. 2002; Webster et al. 2002).”
Stream Fragmentation Thresholds for a Reproductive Guild of Great Plains Fishes (2011, background): “Although the importance of preserving entire riverscapes has recently been recognized as a viable conservation strategy ( Fausch et al. 2002 ), there is limited information on the spatial scale necessary to preserve biodiversity in lotic systems.”
Principles for linking fish habitat to fisheries management and conservation (2005, background): “…been several successful attempts in identifying ecological and social principles to guide management of landscapes (Naiman et al., 1998; Dale et al., 2000), fisheries (Fausch et al., 2002) and water (Stanford et al., 1996; Jackson et al., 2001; Bunn & Arthington, 2002; Bernhardt et al., in press).”
Information needs for assessing critical habitat of freshwater fish (2006, background): “The rationale for protecting critical habitat is rooted in the observation that particular habitats are often disproportionately important to population limitation (Fausch et al. 2002), and therefore they represent priorities for habitat protection.”
Tracking animals in freshwater with electronic tags: past, present and future (2013, background): “For this reason, stationary receiver-loggers (often ter med automatic listening stations) of radio, acoustic and inductive coupling forms have been deplo yed along many reaches of rivers to determine rates of movement and survival [20,22,75,79,80] and along diverging paths to the sea to determine ro”