Movement patterns in inland cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki utah): management and conservation implications
By Amy J. Schrank, F. Rahel. 2004
86 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Aquatic Science, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bda24fb447b230efc8d2726d18fcb1dae54d152c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Aquatic Science
In Ecology
- Teresa Newton
- Jack E. Williams
- J. Downing
- D. Woolnough
- F. Rahel
- H. Neville
- Warren T. Colyer
- Amy L. Haak
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Teresa Newton
- Jack E. Williams
- J. Downing
- D. Woolnough
- F. Rahel
- H. Neville
- Warren T. Colyer
- Amy L. Haak
Citations in the corpus
- Fish movement and habitat use depends on water body size and shape (2009, background): “Spatial utilisation and movement patterns are closely linked to seasonality and life stage (i.e. Schlosser 1991, Schrank and Rahel 2004).”
- Intentional Fragmentation as a Management Strategy in Aquatic Systems (2013, background): “For example, 23% of 40 adult cutthroat trout (O. clarkii) implanted with radio transmitters became entrained and subsequently died in an irrigation canal during a postspawning migration in a Wyoming stream (Schrank and Rahel 2004).”
- Potential Consequences of Climate Change to Persistence of Cutthroat Trout Populations (2009, background): “Unlike many western native trout populations, Bear River populations have maintained a fluvial life history strategy, overwintering in lower-elevation, main-stem habitats and spawning in headwater tributaries (Schrank and Rahel 2004; Colyer et al. 2005).”