Self-Objectification, Risk Taking, and Self-Harm in College Women

By J. Muehlenkamp, Jennifer D. Swanson, Amy M. Brausch. 2005

171 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/084989ad6ed03e20f9f69eaa6fbc8eae1c299531

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Clinical Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Predicting Objectification: Do Provocative Clothing and Observer Characteristics Matter? (2007, background): “When objectified, a woman’s body, or parts of her body, are separated from other personal characteristics (Cheng et al. 2005; Brausch et al. 2005; Moradi et al. 2005).”
Objectification Theory Predicts College Women’s Attitudes Toward Cosmetic Surgery (2010, background): “…and cognitive performance (Fredrickson et al. 1998; Quinn et al. 2006b), with a greater prevalence of selfharming behavior (Harrell et al. 2006; Muehlenkamp et al. 2005) and a disproportionately higher rate of mental health risks, including depression (Grabe et al. 2007; Tiggemann and Kuring…”
Self-Objectification, Self-Esteem, and Gender: Testing a Moderated Mediation Model (2010, background): “However, whereas some researchers have found associations between appearance anxiety and both disordered eating and depression among women (e.g., Greenleaf and McGreer 2006; Szymanski and Henning 2007; Tiggemann and Kuring 2004), as well as between appearance anxiety and depression among men (Tiggem”
Objectification Theory and Psychology of Women: A Decade of Advances and Future Directions (2008, background): “…women who were predominantly White or of unknown racial/ethnic background, data were consistent with the mediating role of body shame in the positive relation of body surveillance with depressive symptoms (Muehlenkamp, Swanson, & Brausch, 2005; Szymanski & Henning, 2007; Tiggemann & Kuring, 2004).”
Feminism: What is it Good For? Feminine Norms and Objectification as the Link between Feminist Identity and Clinically Relevant Outcomes (2007, methodology): “Although a third subscale, Control, was developed as part of the original measure, this subscale is not generally used in models looking at the relationship between the OBCS and clinical outcomes (e.g., Muehlenkamp and Saris-Baglama 2002; Muehlenkamp et al. 2005 ).”
Everyday Stranger Harassment and Women’s Objectification (2008, unknown): “…is positively correlated with negative outcomes, including depression and disordered eating (e.g., Greenleaf, 2005; Harrison & Fredrickson, 2003; Muehlenkamp & Saris-Baglama, 2002; Muehlenkamp, Swanson, & Brausch, 2005; Slater & Tiggemann, 2002; Tiggemann & Kuring, 2004; Tiggemann & Slater, 2001).”
Self-objectification and Well-being: The Impact of Self-objectification on Women’s Overall Sense of Self-worth and Life Satisfaction (2008, methodology): “The body surveillance subscale has been used in previous research to assess selfobjectification (e.g., Greenleaf 2005; Muehlenkamp et al. 2005 ).”
Examining Objectification Theory (2008, unknown): “In fact, prior studies that have used the SOQ have neglected to provide information on its internal reliability (e.g., Fredrickson et al., 1998; Muehlenkamp et al., 2005; Noll & Fredrickson, 1998; Tiggemann & Slater, 2001).”