Optical discrimination of a phytoplankton species in natural mixed populations

By G. Kirkpatrick, D. Millie, Mark A. Moline, Oscar Schofield. 2000

170 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Chemistry, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/07d304b90a2bb93fe69a27dd3f314d7308a2fe59

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Chemistry

1. R. Marin
2. B. Roman
3. D. Greenfield
4. S. Jensen
5. G. Doucette
6. C. Scholin

In Oceanography

1. R. Marin
2. C. Mikulski
3. M. Lewis
4. Grace Chang
5. Tommy D. Dickey
6. G. Doucette
7. C. Scholin

Citations in the corpus

• Field applications of the second‐generation Environmental Sample Processor (ESP) for remote detection of harmful algae: 2006‐2007 (2008, background): “1998; Olson and Sosik 2007), the optical plankton discriminator (Kirkpatrick et al. 2000; Robbins et al. 2006), the Autonomous Microbial Genosensor (Paul et al. 2007), and the Laser In Situ Scattering and Transmissometer (Rienecker et al. 2008).”
• Optical oceanography: Recent advances and future directions using global remote sensing and in situ observations (2006, background): “…color products may include variables such as the diffuse attenuation coefficient of light, which is important for primary production and heating rate problems, CDOM, and perhaps phytoplankton identification by groups if not species [e.g., Kirkpatrick et al., 2000; Stumpf, 2001; Chang et al., 2004].”