GALAXY CLUSTERS SELECTED WITH THE SUNYAEV–ZEL'DOVICH EFFECT FROM 2008 SOUTH POLE TELESCOPE OBSERVATIONS

By F. High, B. Stalder, J. Song, P. Ade, K. Aird, S. Allam, R. Armstrong, W. Barkhouse, B. Benson, E. Bertin and 61 more. 2010

314 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present a detection-significance-limited catalog of 21 Sunyaev–Zel'dovich-selected galaxy clusters. These clusters, along with one unconfirmed candidate, were identified in 178 deg2 of sky surveyed in 2008 by the South Pole Telescope (SPT) to a depth of 18 μK arcmin at 150 GHz. Optical imaging from the Blanco Cosmology Survey (BCS) and Magellan telescopes provided photometric (and in some cases spectroscopic) redshift estimates, with catalog redshifts ranging from z = 0.15 to z>1, with a median z = 0.74. Of the 21 confirmed galaxy clusters, 3 were previously identified as Abell clusters, 3 were presented as SPT discoveries in Staniszewski et al., and 3 were first identified in a recent analysis of BCS data by Menanteau et al.; the remaining 12 clusters are presented for the first time in this work. Simulated observations of the SPT fields predict the sample to be nearly 100% complete above a mass threshold of M200 ≈ 5 × 1014 M☉ h−1 at z = 0.6. This completeness threshold pushes to lower mass with increasing redshift, dropping to ∼4 × 1014 M☉ h−1 at z = 1. The size and redshift distribution of this catalog are in good agreement with expectations based on our current understanding of galaxy clusters and cosmology. In combination with other cosmological probes, we use this cluster catalog to improve estimates of cosmological parameters. Assuming a standard spatially flat wCDM cosmological model, the addition of our catalog to the WMAP seven-year results yields σ8 =  0.81 ±  0.09  and  w = −1.07 ±  0.29, a ∼50% improvement in precision on both parameters over WMAP7 alone.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/07a54d22fcd0cf1baedf65f200d02bc04e97a779

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Andrey V. Kravtsov
  2. Volker Springel
  3. L. Hernquist
  4. Simon D. M. White
  5. P. Hopkins
  6. C. Conroy
  7. Risa Wechsler
  8. Joop Schaye

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

  1. Suman Bhattacharya
  2. Christopher J. Conselice
  3. Joop Schaye
  4. Simon D. M. White
  5. M. Gilfanov
  6. S. Mei
  7. M. White
  8. R. Foley

In Instrumentation

  1. Andrey V. Kravtsov
  2. C. Conroy
  3. Simon D. M. White
  4. L. Hernquist
  5. Volker Springel
  6. A. Renzini
  7. P. Hopkins
  8. Mark Dickinson

Citations in the corpus