Social Networks, Cognitive Style, and Innovative Performance: A Contingency Perspective

182 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Harvesting Value from Brokerage: Individual Strategic Orientation, Structural Holes, and Performance (2017, unknown): “…culture (Xiao&Tsui, 2007), network context and objectives (Ahuja, 2000; Soda & Zaheer, 2012), time (Baum, McEvily, & Rowley, 2012; Soda, Usai, & Zaheer, 2004; Zaheer & Soda, 2009), cognitive styles (Carnabuci & Diószegi, 2015), and individual psychological traits (Mehra, Kilduff, & Brass, 2001).”
Networks, Technology, and Entrepreneurship: A Field Quasi-experiment among Women in Rural India (2017, unknown): “…literature, several researchers offer commentaries on the opportunities and constraints of networks as they relate to different network positions—viz., centrality or network size, brokerage, or closeness (e.g., Carnabuci & Dioszegi, 2015; Cullen, Gerbasi, & ChrobotMason, 2015; Feldman & Ng, 2007).”
Network Structure, Collaborative Context, and Individual Creativity (2019, background): “Different from research that focuses on the contingent effects of individual experience (Fleming et al. 2007) and cognition (Carnabuci and Diószegi 2015), or on contextual heterogeneity (Mors 2005) and collectivism (Xiao and Tsui 2007), our perspective pinpoints a collaborative work environment as…”