Prodromal assessment with the structured interview for prodromal syndromes and the scale of prodromal symptoms: predictive validity, interrater reliability, and training to reliability.
By T. Miller, Thomas H. McGlashan, J. L. Rosen, K. Cadenhead, T. Cannon, J. Ventura, W. McFarlane, D. Perkins, Godfrey D. Pearlson, S. Woods. Schizophrenia bulletin, 2003
1,762 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Philosophy
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0732aa1b6eed52b5999d8059c56ed26bac906cf9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In Psychiatry and Mental health
Citations in the corpus
- Automated analysis of free speech predicts psychosis onset in high-risk youths (2015, methodology): “13 On the basis of earlier fi ndings in schizophrenia, 3,9,14 in which automated text analyses yielded parameters that accurately discriminated between patients and controls, we hypothesized that automated semantic and syntactic analysis of baseline interview transcripts would yield speech features…”
- Predicting Psychosis: Meta-analysis of Transition Outcomes in Individuals at High Clinical Risk (2013, methodology): “The UHR state was independently assessed with the CAARMS,(36) the Basel Screening Instrument for Psychosis,(72) and the SIPS.(35) Psychosis transition was defined according to “standard” criteria (from the 2 major psychiatric diagnostic guidelines, DSM and International Classification of Diseases [I”
- Prediction of psychosis across protocols and risk cohorts using automated language analysis (2018, methodology): “…one of three prodromal syndrome categories, as assessed by the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes/Scale of Prodromal Symptoms (SIPS/SOPS) 16 : a) attenuated positive symptoms, b) brief intermittent psychotic symptoms, or c) a substantial drop in social/role functioning in conjunction…”