Predicting Psychosis: Meta-analysis of Transition Outcomes in Individuals at High Clinical Risk

By Paolo Fusar-Poli, I. Bonoldi, Alison R. Yung, Stefan Borgwardt, M. Kempton, L. Valmaggia, Francesco Barale, E. Caverzasi, Philip McGuire. 2013

776 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Does coaching work? A meta-analysis on the effects of coaching on individual level outcomes in an organizational context (2014, neutral): “First, following the example of Fusar-Poli et al. (2012), we conducted subgroup analyses for sets of studies that were different in terms of study design (mixed designs vs. within-subject designs).”
Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for the management of schizophrenia and related disorders (2016, methodology): “A 2012 meta-analysis (Fusar-Poli et al., 2012) showed that among people identified as being at high risk of psychosis, rates of transition to psychosis were 22% at 1 year and 36% at 3 years.”
Comorbid Depressive and Anxiety Disorders in 509 Individuals With an At-Risk Mental State: Impact on Psychopathology and Transition to Psychosis (2012, background): “Studies were included if they: (1) were reported in an original article in a peer-reviewed journal, (2) involved subjects at high risk for psychosis defined according to established international criteria,1 (3) had reported the proportion of high-risk subjects with longitudinal transition to psychos”