The use of triangulation in qualitative research.

By Nancy Carter, D. Bryant-Lukosius, Alba DiCenso, J. Blythe, A. Neville. Oncology Nursing Forum, 2014

3,373 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Triangulation refers to the use of multiple methods or data sources in qualitative research to develop a comprehensive understanding of phenomena (Patton, 1999). Triangulation also has been viewed as a qualitative research strategy to test validity through the convergence of information from different sources. Denzin (1978) and Patton (1999) identified four types of triangulation: (a) method triangulation, (b) investigator triangulation, (c) theory triangulation, and (d) data source triangulation. The current article will present the four types of triangulation followed by a discussion of the use of focus groups (FGs) and in-depth individual (IDI) interviews as an example of data source triangulation in qualitative inquiry.

Subfields: Education, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/07279b45ea4019cfc6ae5efba1bae0d48b9c672f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

  1. Susan Dean
  2. Saraswati Dawadi
  3. Petra Brysiewicz
  4. Christina N. Harrington
  5. Christen Erlingsson
  6. R. Giri
  7. Sagun Shrestha

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Amanda T. Woodward
  2. Susan Dean
  3. Saraswati Dawadi
  4. Dimitri Williams
  5. Radhika Garg
  6. Christina N. Harrington
  7. R. Giri
  8. Sagun Shrestha

Citations in the corpus