Effects of marine reserve age on fish populations: a global meta‐analysis

By P. Molloy, I. McLean, Isabelle M. Côté. 2009

223 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0721d5c6d9d5f04413207842a568ee6d9d79e53b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. M. Sciberras
2. Andrew Pullin
3. Marissa L. Baskett
4. S. Jenkins
5. Michel J. Kaiser
6. Lewis A. K. Barnett
7. S. Hawkins

In Global and Planetary Change

1. M. Sciberras
2. Andrew Pullin
3. Marissa L. Baskett
4. S. Jenkins
5. Michel J. Kaiser
6. Lewis A. K. Barnett
7. S. Hawkins

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Marissa L. Baskett
2. S. Jenkins
3. Michel J. Kaiser
4. S. Hawkins

Citations in the corpus

• The Ecological and Evolutionary Consequences of Marine Reserves (2015, background): “More generally, however, lack of exploitation can explain why some species do not respond to reserve establishment (Molloy et al. 2009).”
• Evaluating the biological effectiveness of fully and partially protected marine areas (2013, background): “Previous quantitative syntheses of fish populations in no-take reserves have linked the heterogeneity in response to protection among reserves to a number of MPA characteristics such as duration of protection and size of MPA [35,37-39,48].”