Self-renewal and expansion of single transplanted muscle stem cells

By A. Sacco, R. Doyonnas, P. Kraft, S. Vitorovic, Helen M. Blau. Nature, 2008

854 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Adult muscle satellite cells have a principal role in postnatal skeletal muscle growth and regeneration. Satellite cells reside as quiescent cells underneath the basal lamina that surrounds muscle fibres and respond to damage by giving rise to transient amplifying cells (progenitors) and myoblasts that fuse with myofibres. Recent experiments showed that, in contrast to cultured myoblasts, satellite cells freshly isolated or satellite cells derived from the transplantation of one intact myofibre contribute robustly to muscle repair. However, because satellite cells are known to be heterogeneous, clonal analysis is required to demonstrate stem cell function. Here we show that when a single luciferase-expressing muscle stem cell is transplanted into the muscle of mice it is capable of extensive proliferation, contributes to muscle fibres, and Pax7+luciferase+ mononucleated cells can be readily re-isolated, providing evidence of muscle stem cell self-renewal. In addition, we show using in vivo bioluminescence imaging that the dynamics of muscle stem cell behaviour during muscle repair can be followed in a manner not possible using traditional retrospective histological analyses. By imaging luciferase activity, real-time quantitative and kinetic analyses show that donor-derived muscle stem cells proliferate and engraft rapidly after injection until homeostasis is reached. On injury, donor-derived mononucleated cells generate massive waves of cell proliferation. Together, these results show that the progeny of a single luciferase-expressing muscle stem cell can both self-renew and differentiate after transplantation in mice, providing new evidence at the clonal level that self-renewal is an autonomous property of a single adult muscle stem cell.

Subfields: Genetics, Molecular Biology, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/071c675bf0a2c89e012c3b9b5b02dab015e7a5fa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

  1. Michael A. Rudnicki
  2. P. Zammit
  3. C. Bentzinger
  4. F. Relaix
  5. T. Partridge
  6. Nicolas A. Dumont
  7. Marie-Claude Sincennes
  8. Hugo J. G. Snippert

In Molecular Biology

  1. P. Zammit
  2. Michael A. Rudnicki
  3. C. Bentzinger
  4. F. Relaix
  5. T. Partridge
  6. Hans Clevers
  7. Nicolas A. Dumont
  8. Marie-Claude Sincennes

In Surgery

  1. P. Zammit
  2. F. Relaix
  3. C. Bentzinger
  4. Michael A. Rudnicki
  5. Hans Clevers
  6. T. Partridge
  7. Nicolas A. Dumont
  8. Marie-Claude Sincennes

Citations in the corpus