Beyond Stafford and Warr's Reconceptualization of Deterrence: Personal and Vicarious Experiences, Impulsivity, and Offending Behavior
By Alex R. Piquero, Greg Pogarsky. 2002
300 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/06f6c41625e5358caa51727040ffa7516dbe935d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Alex R. Piquero
- S. Jones
- Stephanie E Carmichael
- J. Bonta
- Raymond Paternoster
- Nicole Leeper Piquero
- Volkan Topalli
- Greg Pogarsky
In Sociology and Political Science
- Alex R. Piquero
- Travis C. Pratt
- Stephanie E Carmichael
- Greg Pogarsky
- J. Bonta
- Nicole Leeper Piquero
- S. Jones
- Raymond Paternoster
Citations in the corpus
- Can Punishment Encourage Offending? Investigating The “resetting” Effect (2003, background): “JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN CRIME AND DELINQUENCY, Vol. 40 No. 1, February 2003 95-120 DOI: 10.1177/0022427802239255 © 2003 Sage Publications 95 and Piquero 1995; Piquero and Paternoster 1998; Piquero and Pogarsky 2002; Sherman 1993).”
- Modeling Change in Perceptions about Sanction Threats: The Neglected Linkage in Deterrence Theory (2004, background): “Consistent with Stafford and Warr (1993) and Piquero and Pogarsky (2002) , the propensity for peer offending (which we are treating as the vicarious avoidance of punishment) to reduce perceived sanction certainty is strongest in the post-t1 non-offender group.”
- Criminal Deterrence: A Review of the Literature (2017, background): “A parallel literature has found that risk perceptions are also informed by the experience of acquaintances (Piquero and Pogarsky 2002).”
- Criminal Expertise and Offender Decision-Making An Experimental Analysis of How Offenders and Non-Offenders Differentially Perceive Social Stimuli (2005, background): “2001), comparing the target assessments of incarcerated and active burglars (Nee and Taylor 2000) and using criminal expertise to categorize burglars' and other offenders' 'deterrability' (Nagin and Pogarsky 2001; Pogarsky 2002; Piquero and Pogarsky 2002).”
- Self-control, Victimization, and their Influence on Risky Lifestyles: A Longitudinal Analysis Using Panel Data (2006, background): “Piquero and Pogarsky (2002) , for instance, found that the receipt of punishment had a positive relationship with later offending behavior.”
- Deterrence and Individual Differences Among Convicted Offenders (2007, background): “It has been conceptualized as low self-control (Piquero and Tibbetts 1996; Wright et al. 2004), discounting the future (Nagin and Pogarsky 2001), impulsivity ( Piquero and Pogarsky 2002 ), and self-perceived criminality (Wright et al. 2004).”
- Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. (2010, background): “However, many offenders are impulsive (Gottfredson & Hirschi, 1990) and underestimate the chances of being punished (Piquero & Pogarsky, 2002).”
- Do perceptions of punishment vary between white-collar and street crimes? (2007, background): “Other scholars argue that the consequences of offending, including both personal and vicarious experiences with punishment and punishment avoidance, influence sanction threat perceptions (Paternoster & Piquero, 1995; Piquero & Paternoster, 1998; Piquero & Pogarsky, 2002; Stafford & Warr, 1993).”
- In the Eye of the Impulsive Beholder (2009, background): “Others have found either no moderating effect (Nagin & Pogarsky, 2001) or a curvilinear effect in which individuals either high or low in impulsivity were the most affected by perceived deterrence (Piquero & Pogarsky, 2002).”