Speech Perception

By R. Diehl, A. Lotto, L. Holt. Annual Review of Psychology, 2004

811 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/06dcaa0190b92a257d778712ad884a07584135ae

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Signal Processing

Citations in the corpus

Toward a Common Terminology for Talking about Speech and Reading: A Glossary of the “Phon” Words and Some Related Terms (2002, background): “For a fuller discussion of this interesting and counter-intuitive phenomenon, see Liberman, Cooper, Shankweiler and StuddertKennedy (1967) or Miller (1990).”
The Perception-for-Action-Control Theory (PACT): A perceptuo-motor theory of speech perception. (2012, background): “…ing The Perception-for-Action-Control Theory (PACT): A perceptuo-motor theory of speech perception Jean-Luc Schwartz a,*, Anahita Basirat a, Lucie Ménard b, Marc Sato a a GIPSA-Lab, Speech and Cognition Department (ICP), UMR 5216 CNRS – Grenoble University, France b Laboratoire de…”
Music expertise shapes audiovisual temporal integration windows for speech, sinewave speech, and music (2014, background): “By contrast, natural speech and intelligible sinewave speech are identical in the visual facial movements and linguistic representations, but differ in their spectrotemporal structure of the auditory input (Remez et al., 1981; Lee and Noppeney, 2011b; Vroomen and Stekelenburg, 2011; Stekelenburg and”
Neuroconstructivism - I: How the Brain Constructs Cognition (2007, background): “The best known is how infants, who are initially able to discriminate speech sounds from any human language (Eimas et al., 1971), progressively lose the ability to discriminate phonemes from outside their native language in the second half of the first year (Werker & Tees, 1984).”
Eight questions about spoken-word recognition (2007, background): “…prelexical level, about whether the processes operating there are speech specific, about the role of visual cues in speech processing, and even about whether there is a prelexical level (see Pisoni, this volume, Massaro, this volume, Stevens, 2002, and Diehl et al., 2004, for further discussion).”
Neural specializations for speech and pitch: moving beyond the dichotomies (2008, background): “A particularly compelling observation, for instance, was made by Whalen & Liberman (1987), who noted that the identical formant transition could be perceived categorically or not depending on whether it formed part of a sound complex perceived as a speech syllable or not.”
A Cross-linguistic Study of Sound Symbolism: The Images of Size (2010, neutral): “…research that could bear on this issue would consist of experiments using non-speech stimuli, which has been used to bear on the articulation/acoustic debate in other domains of phonetic theories—especially on the debate about the objects of speech perception (see Diehl et al. 2004 for a review).”
The linguistic perception of similar L2 sounds (2009, background): “That is, psycholinguistic research has shown that the decoding of the acoustic properties of the speech signal precedes the access of meaning (cf. McQueen 2005).”