31A Review of Cognitively Diagnostic Assessment and a Summary of Psychometric Models
By Louis V. DiBello, Louis A. Roussos, W. Stout. 2006
313 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/06d3760f8b5b7d28eeb7d5cc18750f5d789d4da6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Nathan Minchen
- Jonathan Templin
- Robert Henson
- Jimmy de la Torre
- Louis A. Roussos
- Chia-Yi Chiu
- Gongjun Xu
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Jonathan Templin
- Robert Henson
- Chun Wang
- Alan Huebner
- Nathan Minchen
- Louis A. Roussos
- L. DeCarlo
- Jimmy de la Torre
Citations in the corpus
- A Note on Comparing Examinee Classification Methods for Cognitive Diagnosis Models (2011, background): “Many varieties of CDMs based on different statistical models have been proposed; for detailed descriptions and taxonomies of many current CDMs, see Rupp and Templin (2008) and DiBello, Roussos, and Stout (2007).”
- Neural Cognitive Diagnosis for Intelligent Education Systems (2019, background): “Generally, for a cognitive diagnostic system, there are three elements need to be considered: student factors, exercise factors and the interaction function among them (DiBello, Roussos, and Stout 2006).”
- Cognitively Diagnostic Assessments and the Cognitive Diagnosis Model Framework (2014, background): “) Despite our systematic presentation, it should again be emphasized that the process of assessment design is not necessarily linear (DiBello et al., 2007).”
- Skills Diagnosis Using IRT-Based Latent Class Models (2007, methodology): “A table that lists all these models (except the little-used NIDA and NIDO) and summarizes their primary distinctions is given in DiBello et al. (2007) , along with in-depth discussions and examples of how their differences relate to educational”