MODELING DEMOGRAPHIC PERFORMANCE OF NORTHERN SPOTTED OWLS RELATIVE TO FOREST HABITAT IN OREGON

By Gail S. Olson, E. Glenn, R. G. Anthony, E. Forsman, J. Reid, P. Loschl, W. Ripple. 2004

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/06d24ea9e197152a5af2ca26121dc69d3d130ecc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. James D. Nichols
2. L. Bailey
3. T. Mcdonald
4. L. Fahrig
5. J. Hines
6. E. Forsman
7. Adam C. Smith
8. J. Reid

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. L. Bailey
2. James D. Nichols
3. L. Fahrig
4. Adam C. Smith
5. Charles M. Francis
6. Ralph J. Gutierrez
7. G. White
8. K. Burnham

Citations in the corpus

• MODELING OF SITE OCCUPANCY DYNAMICS FOR NORTHERN SPOTTED OWLS, WITH EMPHASIS ON THE EFFECTS OF BARRED OWLS (2005, methodology): “Olson et al. (2004) found a negative effect of territory-specific barred owl presence on spotted owl productivity in 1 study area in Oregon.”
• Confronting collinearity: comparing methods for disentangling the effects of habitat loss and fragmentation (2009, background): “Marzluff (2006), McAlpine et al. (2006a, b), Fletcher and Koford (2002), Olson et al. (2004) , Renfrew and Ribic (2008), Westphal et al. (2003), Wood et al. (2006), Yates and Muzika (2006)”
• THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HABITAT CHARACTERISTICS AND DEMOGRAPHIC PERFORMANCE OF NORTHERN SPOTTED OWLS IN SOUTHERN OREGON (2005, methodology): “In addition, habitat contributed very little to the total model variance in our study (7%), consistent with southern Oregon (2%; Olson et al. 2004), but in contrast to California (Franklin et al. 2000) where habitat explained approximately 43% of the total variance in number of young produced each…”
• The Invasion of Barred Owls and its Potential Effect on the Spotted Owl: a Conservation Conundrum (2007, methodology): “However, it is apparent that the barred owl appears to be having negative impacts on the spotted owl (Gutiérrez et al. 2004; Anthony et al. 2006; Olson et al. 2004, 2005).”
• Modeling co-occurrence of northern spotted and barred owls: Accounting for detection probability differences (2009, background): “Previous studies have followed this approach with reproductive rates (Olson et al., 2004) and probabilities of local extinction and colonization (Olson et al.”
• The effects of habitat, climate, and Barred Owls on long-term demography of Northern Spotted Owls (2016, methodology): “…life-history stages, the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI), the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI), and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO; Franklin et al. 2000, Seamans et al. 2002, LaHaye et al. 2004, Olson et al. 2004, Dugger et al. 2005, Glenn 2010, 2011a, 2011b, Forsman et al. 2011).”
• Demographic response of northern spotted owls to barred owl removal (2016, background): “The underlying ecological premise behind these habitat studies was that northern spotted owl populations were limited by the amount and distribution of habitat (Franklin et al. 2000, Olson et al. 2004, Dugger et al. 2005).”