U.S. attorneys and substantial assistance departures: Testing for interprosecutor disparity
By C. Spohn, Robert Fornango. 2009
105 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/06ce93d59b287f3011017a3d6d5e3e8da7b8c3e5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Jeffery T. Ulmer
- Brian David Johnson
- B. Kutateladze
- Nancy R. Andiloro
- Eric P. Baumer
- D. Mears
- Xia Wang
- S. Bushway
In Sociology and Political Science
- Jeffery T. Ulmer
- Brian David Johnson
- B. Kutateladze
- Nancy R. Andiloro
- Eric P. Baumer
- D. Mears
- Xia Wang
- S. Bushway
Citations in the corpus
- Recent Developments and New Directions in Sentencing Research (2012, background): “…this kind of variation between judges and prosecutors, for example, does not contradict the notion that court community contexts shape actors’ decisions, and that between-actor variation occurs relative to court community norms (see Anderson & Spohn, 2010; Johnson, 2006; Spohn & Fornango, 2009).”
- Opening Pandora’s Box: How Does Defendant Race Influence Plea Bargaining? (2016, background): “…for instance, often reports evidence of racial disparity (Chen, 2008; Rehavi & Starr, 2012; Ulmer, Kurlychek, & Kramer, 2007), as do studies of certain prosecutor-controlled guidelines departures (e.g. Hartley, Maddan, & Spohn, 2007; Johnson, Ulmer, & Kramer, 2008; Spohn & Fornango, 2009).”