Public and private investment in the United States and Canada
By G. Voss. 2002
167 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/06b087f4dcdd34444e8838731a9dc6f763c375a6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- M. Gómez-Antonio
- António Afonso
- Miguel St. Aubyn
- J. Andraz
- S. Gupta
- Alfredo Pereira Jr.
- Fabian Bornhorst
- Elsa Sze
In Gender Studies
- J. Andraz
- M. Gómez-Antonio
- Alfredo Pereira Jr.
- António Afonso
- Bernard Fingleton
- Miguel St. Aubyn
- Christophe Kamps
Citations in the corpus
- The Dynamic Effects of Public Capital: VAR Evidence for 22 OECD Countries (2005, unknown): “Voss (2002) United States, Canada 1947–1996 (Q) VAR (FD)”
- Public Capital and Growth (2010, background): “…rate of return Sturm et al. (1999) Netherlands 1853-1913 Public investment VAR, levels Positive and significant short-run effect; no long-run effect Voss (2002) US and Canada US: 1947-88 (Q); Canada: 1947-96 (Q) Public investment VAR (11 lags); first differences Public investment tends to crowd…”
- Macroeconomic Rates Of Return Of Public And Private Investment: Crowding-In And Crowding-Out Effects (2009, background): “For instance, Voss (2002) estimates a VAR model with GDP, public investment, private investment, the real interest rate, and price deflators of private and public investment, for the US and Canada, for the period 1947-1996. According to the reported results, innovations to public investment crowd ou”
- Regional productivity variation and the impact of public capital stock: an analysis with spatial interaction, with reference to Spain (2012, background): “( 1998 ) and Batina ( 1999 ) show a positive effect, whereas Otto and Voss ( 1996 ) and Voss ( 2002 ) find a negative impact.”
- New Estimates of Government Net Capital Stocks for 22 OECD Countries 1960-2001 (2004, background): “autoregressive models (see, e.g., Mittnik and Neumann (2001) and Voss (2002) ).”
- On the economic effects of public infrastructure investment: A survey of the international evidence (2013, background): “Empirical results reported in Pereira and Andraz (2003) for example suggest that public investment in infrastructures in the US tends to shift the sectoral composition of employment toward construction and transportation and the composition of private investment toward manufacturing, public utilitie”