Combination of individual tree detection and area-based approach in imputation of forest variables using airborne laser data

108 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

An International Comparison of Individual Tree Detection and Extraction Using Airborne Laser Scanning (2012, methodology): “[43] found that the use of visual detection after automated detection of individual trees in area-based inventory did not improve accuracy.”
Comparison of airborne laser scanning methods for estimating forest structure indicators based on Lorenz curves (2014, background): “Maltamo et al. (2004), Lindberg et al. (2010), Vauhkonen et al. (2010) and Vastaranta et al. (2012) combined ABA and ITD with the purpose of overcoming this difficulty and improving estimation accuracy.”
A best practices guide for generating forest inventory attributes from airborne laser scanning data using an area-based approach (2013, unknown): “…but the most common methods used are either parametric (e.g., Means et al. 2000; Næsset 2002; Holmgren 2004; Næsset et al. 2011; Woods et al., 2011) or non-parametric (e.g., Packalén and Maltamo 2007; Hudak et al. 2008; Frazer et al. 2011a; Järnstedt et al. 2012; Vastaranta et al. 2012) approaches.”