What is the True Solubility Advantage for Amorphous Pharmaceuticals?
By Bruno C. Hancock, Michael Parks. Pharmaceutical Research, 2000
1,275 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Pharmaceutical Science, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/064accc53be9e05d7b3b579717baae2c20dce772
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Materials Chemistry
- Christopher J. H. Porter
- W. Charman
- S. Charman
- H. Williams
- R. Shanker
- Natalie L. Trevaskis
- Colin W. Pouton
- R. Müller
In Pharmaceutical Science
- Christopher J. H. Porter
- W. Charman
- Natalie L. Trevaskis
- R. Shanker
- S. Charman
- H. Williams
- Colin W. Pouton
- R. Müller
In Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Citations in the corpus
- Nanocrystal technology, drug delivery and clinical applications (2008, methodology): “The polymorphic modifi cation I has a solubility of 0.13, the high energy modifi cation II a solubility of 0.43 and the amorphous material of 1.6 mg/ml (Hancock and Parks 2000; Chong-Hui and Grant 2001).”
- Strategies to Address Low Drug Solubility in Discovery and Development (2013, background): “…the “equilibrium” solubility of a thermodynamically unstable amorphous material, such that spontaneous crystallization results in underestimation of the initial (kinetic) solubility properties of the amorphous form (Hancock and Parks, 2000; Bhugra and Pikal, 2008; Murdande et al., 2010a,b, 2011a).”
- Maltodextrin/pectin microparticles by spray drying as carrier for nutraceutical extracts (2011, background): “This behaviour may be explained by an increase of the microparticle–water interaction due to both amorphous physical state of the powders, leading to an improving of solubility (Hancock and Parks, 2000), and the smallest dimensions (3.”