MECHANICS OF MATERIALS: TOP-DOWN APPROACHES TO FRACTURE

By J. W. Hutchinson, A. G. Evans. 2000

300 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Mechanics of Materials

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/063f866404f48ebddb50111452d5b2c9bf39b6cc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Materials Chemistry

In Mechanics of Materials

Citations in the corpus

A review on mechanics and mechanical properties of 2D materials—Graphene and beyond (2016, background): “The processes of adhesion and separation can be described by traction–separation relations (TSRs) as in cohesive zone modeling of nonlinear fracture mechanics [312,313].”
Methods for the prediction of fatigue delamination growth in composites and adhesive bonds: A critical review (2013, background): “Hutchinson and Evans have written a concise overview of these investigations [169].”
Analysis of crack growth and crack-tip plasticity in ductile materials using cohesive zone models (2003, background): “The actual shape (form) of the separation law is assumed to be relatively unimportant to the material separation behavior (Tvergaard and Hutchinson, 1992; Wei and Hutchinson, 1999; Hutchinson and Evans, 2000; Rahulkumar et al., 2000; Mohammed and Liechti, 2000).”
Discrete vs smeared crack models for concrete fracture: bridging the gap (2004, unknown): “For ductile fracture [22], the most important parameters of the cohesive surface model appear to be the tensile strength ft and the work of separation or fracture energy Gc Gc 1⁄4 Z s du ð13Þ”
An efficient augmented finite element method for arbitrary cracking and crack interaction in solids (2014, background): “, polymers, concretes, ductile metals, and fiberreinforced polymeric composites), such a treatment is appropriate [52, 53, 57–59].”
Mesh-independent discrete numerical representations of cohesive-zone models (2006, background): “of the cohesive-zone model appear to be the tensile strength ft and the work of separation or fracture energy Gc [7], which is the work needed to create a unit area of fully developed crack.”
Some issues in the application of cohesive zone models for metal–ceramic interfaces (2002, background): “(2000), Mohammed and Liechti (2000), Hutchinson and Evans (2000)) have assumed that two independent parameters (cohesive energy, and either of the cohesive strength or the separation displacement) are sufficient to model interfaces using CZM.”
Comparison between cohesive zone models (2004, background): “[11]; Hutchinson and Evans [12]; Mohammed and Liechti [13]; Needleman [14]; Rahulkumar et al.”
Ductile Fracture by Void Growth to Coalescence (2010, background): “By way of contrast, “top-down” approaches to fracture have emerged over the past few decades as most promising (Hutchinson and Evans, 2000; Pineau, 2006).”